2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0795-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPECT imaging of D2 dopamine receptors and endogenous dopamine release in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, challenge with 2.5 mg/kg amphetamine or 5 mg/kg methylphenidate induced a 21 % reduction of D 2 receptor binding relative to baseline (Schiffer et al , 2006 ). Moreover, comparable results were obtained in a later in vivo imaging study on mice which was performed with the highly-resolving U-SPECT (Jongen et al , 2008 ); in this investigation, application of 2.5 mg/kg amphetamine was found to induce a 27 % reduction of [ 123 I]IBZM binding compared with baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this study, challenge with 2.5 mg/kg amphetamine or 5 mg/kg methylphenidate induced a 21 % reduction of D 2 receptor binding relative to baseline (Schiffer et al , 2006 ). Moreover, comparable results were obtained in a later in vivo imaging study on mice which was performed with the highly-resolving U-SPECT (Jongen et al , 2008 ); in this investigation, application of 2.5 mg/kg amphetamine was found to induce a 27 % reduction of [ 123 I]IBZM binding compared with baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This paradigm is widely employed to assess the function of presynaptic dopaminergic terminals (Ginovart, 2005;Laruelle, 2000). Dopamine is thought to act on [ 123 I]IBZM binding by direct competitive antagonistic binding to the D 2/3 receptor (thereby augmenting the appK d ) as well as by provoking receptors' endocytosis, thereby diminishing receptor concentration that is available for binding (Ginovart et al, 2004;Jongen et al, 2008;Skinbjerg et al, 2010;Sun et al, 2003). Given the complexity of this phenomenon and the potential biological implications, the partial saturation protocol could provide a simple method to assess the impact of the amphetamine challenge on both B avail and appK d .…”
Section: Non-invasive Estimation Of B Avail and Appk D Using A Partiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to indicate the theoretical levels of spatial resolution that we might achieve with our current multi-pinhole system and the projection magnification on the front and back detectors. Using the same camera figuration we simulated projection data from a more realistic phantom of a mouse brain (figure 15) with an activity ratio of 7:1 between striatum and the rest of the brain, which was roughly estimated based on an in vivo mouse brain study (Jongen et al 2008). The projection images of this phantom on one of the front detectors and one of the back detectors is presented in figure 16.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%