2022
DOI: 10.1364/oe.459213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speckle denoising based on deep learning via a conditional generative adversarial network in digital holographic interferometry

Abstract: Speckle denoising can improve digital holographic interferometry phase measurements but may affect experimental accuracy. A deep-learning-based speckle denoising algorithm is developed using a conditional generative adversarial network. Two subnetworks, namely discriminator and generator networks, which refer to the U-Net and DenseNet layer structures are used to supervise network learning quality and denoising. Datasets obtained from speckle simulations are shown to provide improved noise feature extraction. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: 40 pairs (15,360 patches) l 2 -norm Tahon et al 214 , 215 Noisy sine and cosine Noise-free sine and cosine DnCNN Sim. : 25 pairs and 128 pairs l 2 -norm Fang et al 216 Noisy real, imaginary Noise-free real, imaginary U-Net Sim. : 4000 pairs GAN loss Murdaca et al 217 Noisy real, imaginary, and amplitude Noise-free real, imaginary, and amplitude U-Net Sim.…”
Section: Dl-post-processing For Phase Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: 40 pairs (15,360 patches) l 2 -norm Tahon et al 214 , 215 Noisy sine and cosine Noise-free sine and cosine DnCNN Sim. : 25 pairs and 128 pairs l 2 -norm Fang et al 216 Noisy real, imaginary Noise-free real, imaginary U-Net Sim. : 4000 pairs GAN loss Murdaca et al 217 Noisy real, imaginary, and amplitude Noise-free real, imaginary, and amplitude U-Net Sim.…”
Section: Dl-post-processing For Phase Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To go further, they released a more comprehensive dataset for conditions of severe speckle noise 215 . Fang et al 216 applied GAN to do speckle noise reduction for phase. Murdaca et al 217 applied this deep-learning-based phase noise reduction to interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) 218 .…”
Section: Dl-post-processing For Phase Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, with the application of deep learning in optical metrology [31], such as image denoising [32,33], fringe pattern enhancement [34], wrapped phase retrieval [35], phase unwrapping [36], and stereo matching [37], many researchers have applied deep learning to FPP in order to obtain accurate wrapped phases with fewer patterns and further achieve phase unwrapping. Qian et al [38] proposed a single-shot absolute 3D shape measurement with deeplearning-based color FPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, traditional denoising methods that target Gaussian characteristics are less effective in speckle noise, which has non-Gaussian and non-statistical characteristics [7]. The implementation of deep learning methods presents a viable resolution to this issue [8,9]. In our previous work [8], a speckle denoising approach via Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGANs) for speckle denoising is proposed, which is trained by using a paired dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of deep learning methods presents a viable resolution to this issue [8,9]. In our previous work [8], a speckle denoising approach via Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGANs) for speckle denoising is proposed, which is trained by using a paired dataset. However, directly obtaining speckle-free holograms experimentally as a reference for model training is unattainable, it makes building the dataset a challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%