2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specimen Size Effect and Dynamic Increase Factor for Basalt Fiber–Reinforced Concrete Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most researchers (Grote et al, 2001; Chen et al, 2013; Hao and Hao, 2013; Wang et al, 2018; Ganorkar et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2021) correlate the dynamic compressive strength to the static compressive strength by dynamic increase factor (DIF) to quantify the strain rate sensitivity of the material. DIF is obtained as the dynamic compressive strength normalized by the average quasi-static compressive strength of concrete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most researchers (Grote et al, 2001; Chen et al, 2013; Hao and Hao, 2013; Wang et al, 2018; Ganorkar et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2021) correlate the dynamic compressive strength to the static compressive strength by dynamic increase factor (DIF) to quantify the strain rate sensitivity of the material. DIF is obtained as the dynamic compressive strength normalized by the average quasi-static compressive strength of concrete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers have different opinion with respect to the variation of critical strain (at maximum strength) with the strain rate. Ganorkar et al (2021) and Wang et al (2018) reported that the critical strain corresponding to maximum strength increases with an increase in the strain rate. Grote et al (2001) performed the experimental study on the mortar specimens and reported a slight increase in the critical strain with the increase in the strain rate.
Figure 18.Strain rate effect on the critical and ultimate strain.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f c,d is the dynamic compressive strength and f c,s is the quasistatic compressive strength. Test data for this article were contributed by several BFRC dissertations [30][31][32][33][34][35]. It was decided to utilize only specimens tested at 28 days, since many concrete standards focus on strength.…”
Section: Dif = mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain rate of the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) is between 50 and 10 4 s -1 (Chen et al, 2003; Zhao and Gary, 1996), which is widely used in the high strain rate loading experiment to investigate the dynamic increase factor (DIF) of concrete (Al-Mousawi et al, 1997; Chen et al, 2020). The compressive strength, post-peak load-carrying capacity, and energy absorption capability of FRC are increased with increasing the fiber content under quasi-static loading and high strain rate loading (Ganorkar et al, 2021; Hao and Hao, 2013; Xu et al, 2012a). The larger the aspect ratio of the steel fibers, the greater the improvement in static and dynamic compressive strength of ultra-high performance FRC (Su et al, 2016; Yoo and Banthia, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%