2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02577-8_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying the Representation of Non-geometric Information in 3D Virtual Environments

Abstract: Abstract. In 3D virtual environments (3DVE), we need to know what an object looks like (i.e. geometric information) and what the object is, what are its properties and characteristics and how it relates to other objects (i.e. non-geometric information). Several interactive presentation techniques have been devised to incorporate non-geometric information into 3DVEs. The relevance of a technique depends on the context. Therefore, the choice of an appropriate representation technique cannot be done once for all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For visualization purposes, this variety of data implies elaborating solutions that still guarantee the understanding of underlying information: e.g., comprehending ownership boundaries, retrieving ownership information, analyzing 3D spatial relationships. To this end, occlusion management and enhancement techniques are extremely suitable as they facilitate geospatial data exploration (Bazargan and Falquet, 2009;Trapp et al, 2011). For example, transparency and 3D explosion probe can significantly improve the visual discovery of objects enclosed or contained within other objects (e.g., rooms inside buildings, pipes and electricity networks under the ground) (Assarsson et al, 2006;Coffin and Höllerer, 2006;Sonnet et al, 2004).…”
Section: Context and Problematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For visualization purposes, this variety of data implies elaborating solutions that still guarantee the understanding of underlying information: e.g., comprehending ownership boundaries, retrieving ownership information, analyzing 3D spatial relationships. To this end, occlusion management and enhancement techniques are extremely suitable as they facilitate geospatial data exploration (Bazargan and Falquet, 2009;Trapp et al, 2011). For example, transparency and 3D explosion probe can significantly improve the visual discovery of objects enclosed or contained within other objects (e.g., rooms inside buildings, pipes and electricity networks under the ground) (Assarsson et al, 2006;Coffin and Höllerer, 2006;Sonnet et al, 2004).…”
Section: Context and Problematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides static visual variables and 3D environment settings, additional techniques have been developed in order to improve the visualization of 3D geospatial environments. Bazargan and Falquet [51] show the suitability of seven enhancement techniques (illustrative shadows, virtual PDA, croquet 3D windows, croquet 3D interactor, 2D medial layer, sidebar, and 3D labels) for the depiction of non-geometric information, while Trapp et al [52] classify object-highlighting techniques useful for the visualization of user's selection, query results, and navigation. The classification is carried out based on the type of rendering: style-variance techniques (focus-based style or context-based style), outlining techniques, and glyph-based techniques.…”
Section: Enhancement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voigt & Polowinski (2011) aim at developing a unifying ontology applicable in visualization systems. Bazargan and Falquet (2009) have proposed to use description logics to represent the usability of techniques in a given context and to reason about it.…”
Section: Visualization Ontologies or Taxonomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%