1985
DOI: 10.2307/2098481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying the Dynamics of Industry Concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We explore the extent to which concentration levels for industries in our data can be explained by these variables. In that our approach is close to some of the earlier research on the determinants of industrial concentration: see, for instance, the survey by Curry and George (1983), and Levy (1985).…”
Section: The Determinants Of Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We explore the extent to which concentration levels for industries in our data can be explained by these variables. In that our approach is close to some of the earlier research on the determinants of industrial concentration: see, for instance, the survey by Curry and George (1983), and Levy (1985).…”
Section: The Determinants Of Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We allow that actual concentration level in an industry, C it , may diverge from its equilibrium value but assume that it adjusts towards its equilibrium value. We follow existing studies (Levy, 1985;Kambhampati, 1996;Davies and Geroski, 1997;Driffield, 2001) in modelling adjustment as an adaptive process:…”
Section: Evolution Of Concentration: Industry-specific Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MES is the lowest quantity of output required to minimise average costs and so, for a given market size, is hypothesised to have a positive effect on industrial concentration. CAPR is hypothesised to have a positive effect on industrial concentration because it measures capital requirements and economies of scale in raising capital (Levy 1985). Larger SIZE is hypothesised to have a negative impact on industrial concentration because a larger market can support more firms.…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient for the four firm concentration ratio (CONCENTRATION) only has a significant (negative) effect on turbulence in the FGLS estimation and, even then, the magnitude of the coefficient is relatively small -an increase of one percentage point in the combined market share of the four largest firms would result in a decrease of only 0.017 in the turbulence rate. The dynamic role played by decreases in concentration in generating turbulence (as proposed by Levy, 1985), measured by the effect of the change in the Herfindhal index, although significant, is also relatively small.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Levy (1985) suggests that the rate of change in concentration influences entry. For example, sharp increases in market concentration indicate increasing levels of industry barriers causes less turbulence.…”
Section: Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%