1998
DOI: 10.1080/10864415.1998.11518334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying Deadlines with Continuous Time Using Deontic and Temporal Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem is of the same order of greatness as the fundamental problems indicated by von Wright in his previous work, and it is for this reason that it should have been included in the book. Furthermore, the ®rst two authors (Dignum and Kuiper 1998) have shown that the formalisms are useful in describing procedures in electronic commerce and in agent applications.…”
Section: Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is of the same order of greatness as the fundamental problems indicated by von Wright in his previous work, and it is for this reason that it should have been included in the book. Furthermore, the ®rst two authors (Dignum and Kuiper 1998) have shown that the formalisms are useful in describing procedures in electronic commerce and in agent applications.…”
Section: Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic behaviour that uses timing information and strives to obtain timed properties have been referred to in many branches of computer science. For instance, timely fulfilment of contractual obligations is an important subject in deontic analysis of deadlines (Dignum & Kuiper, 1998;Broersen, Dignum, Dignum, & Meyer, 2004). As another example, the existence of timing attacks, where the attacker can compromise the system by analysing the time taken to execute different operations, create the need for timing analysis in verification of security (Kocher, 1996).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, in this approach, the notion of the social contract differs from the one presented in Dellarocas [63] where both social and interaction contracts are merged into the social contract notion. Both types of contracts are represented through the Logic for Contract Representation (LCR) language [71], that is based on the Temporal and Deontic Logic (BTLcont) [68] and the branching-time temporal logic (CTL*) [76]. Based on this logic, formulae are represented as branching structures where nodes represent states and arcs represent events.…”
Section: Virtual Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%