2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijwgs.2012.049167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specifying and implementing an eventual leader service for dynamic systems

Abstract: Abstract:The election of an eventual leader in an asynchronous system prone to process crashes is an important problem of faulttolerant distributed computing. This problem is known as the implementation of the failure detector Ω. Nearly all papers that propose algorithms implementing such an eventual leader service consider a static system. In contrast this paper considers a dynamic system, i.e., a system in which processes can enter and leave. The paper has three contributions. It first proposes a specificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Larrea et al [17] has pointed out the details and the keys to elect an eventual leader. In other words, to achieve the goal of electing an eventual leader, there are some significant conditions which must be satisfied, such as stability and synchrony condition-a leader should be elected under the circumstance of no more processes joining in or leaving out the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Larrea et al [17] has pointed out the details and the keys to elect an eventual leader. In other words, to achieve the goal of electing an eventual leader, there are some significant conditions which must be satisfied, such as stability and synchrony condition-a leader should be elected under the circumstance of no more processes joining in or leaving out the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions capture synchrony/stability requirements which are sufficient to solve non-trivial problems. Examples of problems and assumptions which allow these problems to be solved despite the uncertainty created by dynamicity are consensus (e.g., [8,11,16]), leader election (e.g., [17]), and mutual exclusion [21]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%