2018
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/y84pu
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity of Future Thinking in Depression: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Reduced specificity of autobiographical memory has been well established in depression, but whether this ‘overgenerality’ extends to future thinking has not been the focus of a meta-analysis. Following a preregistered protocol, we searched six electronic databases, Google Scholar, personal libraries, and contacted authors in the field for studies matching search terms related to depression, future thinking, and specificity. We reduced an initial 7,332 results to 46 included studies, with 89 effect sizes and 4,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As predicted, higher well-being and lower depressive symptoms were correlated with greater clarity, vividness, and detail (although the association between detail and depressive symptoms did not quite reach the threshold for substantial evidence). The magnitude of these effects was almost identical to that estimated in our recent meta-analysis on the specificity of future thinking in depression (Gamble et al, 2019). Evidence for the fragmentation of simulations was only inconclusive, despite small correlations in the predicted directions.…”
Section: Goal-directed Imaginationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As predicted, higher well-being and lower depressive symptoms were correlated with greater clarity, vividness, and detail (although the association between detail and depressive symptoms did not quite reach the threshold for substantial evidence). The magnitude of these effects was almost identical to that estimated in our recent meta-analysis on the specificity of future thinking in depression (Gamble et al, 2019). Evidence for the fragmentation of simulations was only inconclusive, despite small correlations in the predicted directions.…”
Section: Goal-directed Imaginationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As with goal setting, individual differences in simulation have been linked to important functional outcomes. In depression, for example, episodic simulation of positive future events tends to be less specific and detailed (Gamble, Moreau, Tippett, & Addis, 2019), and mental imagery is often experienced from an observer (third-person) rather than field (first-person) perspective (Holmes, Blackwell, Burnett Heyes, Renner, & Raes, 2016). Individuals who are able to more vividly imagine positive scenes in their future also tend to be more optimistic (Ji, Holmes, & Blackwell, 2017).…”
Section: Imagination and Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note, however, that moderation by valence was across all studies (k = 19), so it is possible that MDD (k = 7) shows differential effects to other psychopathologies such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. A subsequent meta-analysis conducted solely including depressive samples resulted in 37 studies and suggested that depressive symptoms contributed to reduced specificity for future events, more so for positive future thinking relative to negative or neutral future thinking (Gamble, Moreau, Tippett, & Addis, 2018). Considering the ability to detail future scenarios is necessary to plan and pursue goals, it can be argued that the hot cognitive profile of MDD manifests as a broader spectrum of cold cognitive deficits including planning and problem-solving abilities.…”
Section: Biased Memory For Negative Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, patients with depression show deficits in retrieving concrete, specific details of positive episodic memories (Williams & Scott 1988). These patients also show deficits in updating negative abstract representations from new, concrete instances to the contrary (Korn et al 2014), and in producing vivid prospections about future positive events (Gamble et al 2019). These patients have access to abstract knowledge, but without concrete details, they are stymied in their attempts to simulate successfully.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%