This manuscript presents the design and initial outcomes of the New England Family Study's (NEFS) High-Risk Project, one of the few epidemiologically representative cohorts that has prospectively followed a large sample of offspring of parents with both affective and non-affective psychotic disorders from the fetal period forward. The goals of this report are: (1) to describe in some detail the design, data collection methods, and resulting sample of this project; and (2) to prospectively identify and compare rates of childhood neurological impairments among offspring of psychotic and nonpsychotic parents, with a particular emphasis on offspring risk in relation to specific classes of parental psychosis (i.e., affective vs. non-affective psychosis). The investigators identified a pool of 755 parents with potential psychotic disorders, located over 80% of these and confirmed psychotic diagnoses for 212 affected parents and 132 unaffected control parents. At birth, the 259 offspring of parents with psychosis had approximately a twofold increased risk of abnormal neurological functioning compared to offspring of families with no psychotic history. This was most pronounced among the 58 offspring of parents with schizophrenia. Similar trends were observed at ages 1 and 7 years although these did not reach statistical significance. Neither at birth nor at any of the follow-up assessments were the 157 offspring of parents with affective psychosis found to be at elevated risk of neurological impairment. Implications for future research and potential preventive interventions for at-risk individuals are discussed.
INTRODUCTIONHigh-risk (HR) studies have proven invaluable over the past 50 years to advance understanding of the biological and social origins and course of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders [Niemi et al., 2003;Cunningham Owens and Johnstone, 2006]. Alternative designs, such as cohort and conscript studies, are difficult to carry out due to the relatively low incidence of psychotic disorders in the general population, necessitating a large sample of individuals at general risk. An associated challenge is that with such large samples it is difficult and expensive to collect rich and detailed premorbid assessments prior to the onset of later psychotic disorders. In contrast, HR studies-in which a disorder or a condition is studied by selecting individuals at established elevated risk for the disorder [Cornblatt and Obuchowski, 1997]-require smaller sample sizes and allow a wider range of methods to be employed because of reduced expense in sampling. Specifically, the ability to identify individuals at a very early age (sometimes at or even before
653Neuropsychiatric Genetics birth) who are at elevated risk of developing schizophrenia later in life owing to an ill family member, usually parents or siblings, ("family HR" or "genetic HR" design) has supplemented the work from cohort studies, and has permitted focused and detailed assessments of premorbid conditions.Prior family high-risk (FHR) studies hav...