2001
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.181479798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity in intracellular protein aggregation and inclusion body formation

Abstract: Protein aggregation is widely considered to be a nonspecific coalescence of misfolded proteins, driven by interactions between solvent-exposed hydrophobic surfaces that are normally buried within a protein's interior. Accordingly, abnormal interactions between misfolded proteins with normal cellular constituents has been proposed to underlie the toxicity associated with protein aggregates in many neurodegenerative disorders. Here we have used fluorescence resonance energy transfer and deconvolution microscopy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
144
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
12
144
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these results suggest that the intracellular accumulation of misfolded proteins is a selective process, and that the sequence of aggregating protein determines the composition and cellular distribution of aggregates. Indeed, this conclusion is supported by two recent reports emphasizing the specificity of formation of inclusion bodies by other aggregating proteins (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Together, these results suggest that the intracellular accumulation of misfolded proteins is a selective process, and that the sequence of aggregating protein determines the composition and cellular distribution of aggregates. Indeed, this conclusion is supported by two recent reports emphasizing the specificity of formation of inclusion bodies by other aggregating proteins (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Although the colocalization of Rnq1 and newly forming Sup35 aggregates supports the seeding model, our results suggest that once seeding has occurred Rnq1 and Sup35 do not coassemble, but, rather, each protein has a much greater capacity to convert itself than to cross convert. Also, colocalization without extensive coaggregation was reported (46) for an aggregation-prone rhodopsin mutant and a construct with an expanded polyQ stretch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…aggregate when expressed in the absence of its oligomeric partners (40) (Fig. 1D), and P23H rhodopsin, a folding-defective G protein-coupled receptor (40) (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%