2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specificity and generalization of attentional bias in sexual trauma victims suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, measures of trauma-related Stroop interference have been shown to positively correlate with PTSD symptom severity (McNally et al, 1990; Cassiday et al, 1992; Paunovic et al, 2002; Fleurkens et al, 2011). Stroop interference in PTSD appears to be specific to trauma-related material, although some studies have reported interference to other types of emotional stimuli (Litz et al, 1996; Paunovic et al, 2002).…”
Section: Emotional Effects On Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, measures of trauma-related Stroop interference have been shown to positively correlate with PTSD symptom severity (McNally et al, 1990; Cassiday et al, 1992; Paunovic et al, 2002; Fleurkens et al, 2011). Stroop interference in PTSD appears to be specific to trauma-related material, although some studies have reported interference to other types of emotional stimuli (Litz et al, 1996; Paunovic et al, 2002).…”
Section: Emotional Effects On Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in VST reaction times depend on the number and location of distracters which further burdens the interpretation and comparability of the results (e.g., Ohman et al, 2001). Second, evidence is yet inconclusive with regard to the specificity of attentional bias components in PTSD (e.g., Fleurkens et al, 2011). On the one hand, it remains unclear, to which extent each attentional bias component is specific for trauma-related cues (''pathology congruent'', for a review see Williams et al (1997)) or generalizes to other emotional material (e.g., general threat-, depression-related, i.e., ''stimulus specifity'').…”
Section: Dot-probe and Visual Search Tasks In Attentional Bias Researmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were presented with an arrow Flanker task (Ridderinkhof et al, 1999) and were asked 8 to identify whether the centrally presented arrow was pointing to the left or to the right while 9 ignoring two adjacent arrows on either side, pointing in the same (congruent trial) or in the 10 opposite direction (incongruent trials). Participants were asked to make a decision by pressing 11 either the right or left button.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%