2016
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2016.1182824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specification of surface parameters effects on corrosion behavior of the AISI 316Ti in dependence on experimental methods

Abstract: Stainless steels usually suffer localized corrosion, such as pitting and crevice corrosion, in chloride containing oxidizing environments. Their corrosion resistance depends on materials chemical composition, microstructure, heat treatment, surface finishing, and also on environment character (composition of electrolyte, temperature, pH, flow, etc.). The subject of the work is investigation of mechanical (grinding) and combined (grinding + pickling) surface treatment effect on corrosion behavior of stainless s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dealing with the numerous architectural and domestic applications of SSs, their surface finishing becomes a factor of primary importance from an aesthetic and a commercial point of view. At the same time, it is necessary to consider that surface finishing significantly influences the localized corrosion resistance of these metallic materials in chloride environments, as reported by the present authors [5,6] and by many other authors [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In particular, there is a certain agreement among them on the relationship between pitting potential and surface roughness, expressed in terms of Ra and Rz parameters, when the surface of the samples is treated by different technological processes or when 2 of 12 samples are submitted to a grinding operation producing the same surface finishing but different roughness [5,6,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Dealing with the numerous architectural and domestic applications of SSs, their surface finishing becomes a factor of primary importance from an aesthetic and a commercial point of view. At the same time, it is necessary to consider that surface finishing significantly influences the localized corrosion resistance of these metallic materials in chloride environments, as reported by the present authors [5,6] and by many other authors [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In particular, there is a certain agreement among them on the relationship between pitting potential and surface roughness, expressed in terms of Ra and Rz parameters, when the surface of the samples is treated by different technological processes or when 2 of 12 samples are submitted to a grinding operation producing the same surface finishing but different roughness [5,6,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It could be related to the higher aggressiveness of 5 wt % FeCl 3 solution (redox potential 0.691 V) used as 1 M Cl − solution for exposure test compared to 0.9 M NaCl + 0.1 M HCl (redox potential 0.509 V) used for PP. Differences in corrosion process during electrochemical and exposure immersion tests could also have contributed to the observed phenomenon [ 40 , 41 ]. In potentiodynamic polarization, the corrosion process is influenced by a controlled change of potential in the anodic direction from minimum to maximum with a selected sweep rate (mV/s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proves that pickling affects the protective effectivity of the passive layer. In comparison with the ground surface according to [23,24], the measured electrochemical characteristics were worse. According to the potentiodynamic cyclic test results a positive effect of pickling is visible on the tested surfaces.…”
Section: Exposure Testmentioning
confidence: 99%