1999
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48437-x_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specification of Bahavioural Requirements within Compositional Multi-agent System Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extensive program underway at the Free University of Amsterdam on compositional methodologies for requirements [11], design [4], and verification [14] uses graphical representations with strong links to UML's collaboration diagrams, as well as linear (formulaic) notations better suited to alignment with UML's metamodel than with the graphical mechanisms that are our focus. Our discussion of the compositionality of protocols is anticipated in the work of Burmeister et al [7], though our notation differs widely from hers.…”
Section: Agent Software Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extensive program underway at the Free University of Amsterdam on compositional methodologies for requirements [11], design [4], and verification [14] uses graphical representations with strong links to UML's collaboration diagrams, as well as linear (formulaic) notations better suited to alignment with UML's metamodel than with the graphical mechanisms that are our focus. Our discussion of the compositionality of protocols is anticipated in the work of Burmeister et al [7], though our notation differs widely from hers.…”
Section: Agent Software Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UML model semantics are represented by a metamodel whose structure is also formally defined by OCL syntax. OCL and the metamodel offer resources to capture the kinds of logical specifications anticipated in (for example) [4,11,14,15,16,28], but space does not permit exploring this use of UML in this paper.…”
Section: Umlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent literature on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, temporal languages to specify dynamic properties of processes have been put forward; for example, Dardenne, Lamsweerde and Fickas, 1993;Dubois, Du Bois and Zeipen, 1995;Herlea, Jonker, Treur, and Wijngaards, 1999). To specify properties on the dynamics of reasoning processes in particular, the temporal trace language TTL used in (Herlea et al, 1999;Jonker and Treur, 1998) is adopted.…”
Section: A Temporal Trace Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To specify properties on the dynamics of reasoning processes in particular, the temporal trace language TTL used in (Herlea et al, 1999;Jonker and Treur, 1998) is adopted. This is a language in the family of languages to which also situation calculus (Reiter, 2001) and event calculus (Kowalski and Sergot, 1986) belong, and was also succesfully used to analyse multi-representational reasoning processes in Reasoning trace.…”
Section: A Temporal Trace Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To specify properties on the dynamics within the organisation, the temporal trace language used in [11], [8], is adopted. This is a language in the family of languages to which also situation calculus [14], event calculus [13], and fluent calculus [9] belong.…”
Section: The Temporal Trace Language To Specify Dynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%