Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Software Reusability 1995
DOI: 10.1145/211782.211817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specification matching for software reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The filtering algorithm shows that the combination of linguistic and signature algorithms can result in higher precision than if the algorithms were used individually. This is in step with the intuitive argument that has been made before [22,6,4].…”
Section: Qomym Match Qualitysupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The filtering algorithm shows that the combination of linguistic and signature algorithms can result in higher precision than if the algorithms were used individually. This is in step with the intuitive argument that has been made before [22,6,4].…”
Section: Qomym Match Qualitysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Many techniques ranging from keyword-based to full-fledged specification-based heuristics have been proposed in the literature [7,12,8,21,22,6,4] to provide effective retrieval of qualified components during the discovery process. The keyword-based approach [7] is simple and flexible as users simply specify the query as a set of keywords representing the component requirements in which they are interested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of techniques have been used for indicating desired functionality for reuse, including signature matching [10], and specification matching [6]. Signature matching and specification matching both place a high burden on the developer to provide precise input; both approaches either will fail to retrieve pertinent source code if exact but inappropriate details are provided, or will retrieve an excessive number of results, demanding laborious examination by the developer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], relations between expressions, units and modules can be specified with the specification language of the CARE system. In [8], a contact based specification is used to query the relations between methods and components. In [9], a semantic indexing based specification is adopted in the query for the component relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%