2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specification-Driven Multi-perspective Predictive Business Process Monitoring

Abstract: Predictive analysis in business process monitoring aims at forecasting the future information of a running business process. The prediction is typically made based on the model extracted from historical process execution logs (event logs). In practice, different business domains might require different kinds of predictions. Hence, it is important to have a means for properly specifying the desired prediction tasks, and a mechanism to deal with these various prediction tasks. Although there have been many studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our implementation, to get the expected quality of predictions, the users are allowed to choose the desired classification/regression model as well as the feature encoding mechanisms (in order to allow some sort of feature engineering). This article extends [57] in several ways. First, we extend the specification language so as to incorporate various aggregate functions such as Max, Min, Average, Sum, Count, and Concat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In our implementation, to get the expected quality of predictions, the users are allowed to choose the desired classification/regression model as well as the feature encoding mechanisms (in order to allow some sort of feature engineering). This article extends [57] in several ways. First, we extend the specification language so as to incorporate various aggregate functions such as Max, Min, Average, Sum, Count, and Concat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We proceed this validation by comparing the performance of ORANGE to that of the list of competitors -based on SVM, LR, RF and XGB -introduced in [5], 7 as well as the competitor -based on LSTM -described in [25]. 8 SVM, LR, RF and XGB are run using the optimization described in [5] to select the hyperparameters of the machine learning algorithms. In addition, similarly to ORANGE, they use the Aggregation schema for the trace feature extraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of the correct class is based on a classification model extracted from historical process execution logs (event logs) [8]. In particular, current methods for outcome-oriented predictive process mainly follow the standard pipeline for classification involving two phases: (i) a feature extraction phase where features are extracted from event traces so that each trace is abstracted as a vector of features representing event occurrences and (ii) a classifier construction phase, where feature vectors are given as input to a machine learning method (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it categorizes approaches in the literature based on their process-awareness, i.e., whether or not an approach employs an explicit representation of process models. Santoso [12] specified a language for properly defining the prediction task, enabling researchers to express various types of predictive monitoring problems while not relying on any particular machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%