2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4660-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific timely appointments for triage to reduce wait times in a medical outpatient clinic: protocol of a pre-post study with process evaluation

Abstract: BackgroundManaging demand for services is a problem in many areas of healthcare, including specialist medical outpatient clinics. Some of these clinics have long waiting lists with variation in access for referred people. A model of triage and appointment allocation has been developed and tested that has reduced waiting times by about a third in community outpatient services. This study aims to determine whether the model can be applied in the setting of a specialist medical outpatient clinic to reduce wait ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential solutions such as streamlining clinic flow/processes and improved provider-patient communication (e.g., use of signposts) to direct clients to correct queues and improve client satisfaction when there are staff shortages should be considered to reduce waiting time [ 35 ]. Campus health services could potentially address this barrier and, together with a model of appointment allocation, reduce waiting times and the negative impact of care-seeking on students’ studies [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential solutions such as streamlining clinic flow/processes and improved provider-patient communication (e.g., use of signposts) to direct clients to correct queues and improve client satisfaction when there are staff shortages should be considered to reduce waiting time [ 35 ]. Campus health services could potentially address this barrier and, together with a model of appointment allocation, reduce waiting times and the negative impact of care-seeking on students’ studies [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could complement other initiatives that may contribute to shortening specialist wait times including telehealth consults [ 22 ] (electronic asynchronous consultations obviating the need for face to face appointments between patient and specialist) and e-referral systems (i.e. province wide electronic health referral system where wait times could be viewed and referral status could be tracked), pre-assessment in specialized clinics [ 23 ] (a model of triage and appointment allocation to reduce wait times), and central intake [ 24 ] (instead of having multiple-queues and multiple-servers to manage referrals, specific specialists in a given jurisdiction would have a single queue allowing each patient to see the first available specialist) [ 25 , 26 ]. In 2008, the Edmonton North Primary Care Network (PCN) developed a provincial e-referral system, which includes a specialist database with information on specialist referral requirements, forms and protocols, and tracks wait times [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is acknowledged that this study has effectively reduced a significantly large and long waitlist, but that this is of little worth unless it is sustained and embedded to implement the governing policy objective – to provide equitable and timely access to the epilepsy clinic. This observational study achieved its aim and places the epilepsy clinic in readiness to implement the next phase of the STAT model, which aims to achieve sustained reductions in waiting time after reducing or eliminating the waitlist (Lewis et al , 2019). The next part of this research will tackle the continued integration of changed behaviour, administration and management of demand for the service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design is an observational study of the localised impact of the reduction of a waitlist in an epilepsy clinic. This was conducted as a component of a broader study evaluating an intervention to reduce wait time from referral to first appointment (Lewis et al , 2019). Ethical approval was provided by the health service and university Human Research Ethics Committees, reference number LR19/014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%