The Microbiological Quality of Food 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100502-6.00006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Spoilage Organisms (SSOs) in Fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
2
97
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Biogenic amines are not produced in considerable amounts in non-scombroid fish, while TVB-N increases in fish only at the late stages of storage, and cannot be used as spoilage/freshness markers [6]. ATP degradation products, which is a result of autolytic changes, affect sensory attributes only at the beginning of shelf life and not throughout storage period [7] and definitely does not determine fresh fish shelf life, which is a result of the accumulation of microbial metabolites [8,9]. A suitable spoilage marker should be a metabolite produced by the main spoilage microorganisms, exhibit a consistent profile, preferably increase during storage, and show satisfactory correlation with microbial growth, sensory score and remaining shelf life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biogenic amines are not produced in considerable amounts in non-scombroid fish, while TVB-N increases in fish only at the late stages of storage, and cannot be used as spoilage/freshness markers [6]. ATP degradation products, which is a result of autolytic changes, affect sensory attributes only at the beginning of shelf life and not throughout storage period [7] and definitely does not determine fresh fish shelf life, which is a result of the accumulation of microbial metabolites [8,9]. A suitable spoilage marker should be a metabolite produced by the main spoilage microorganisms, exhibit a consistent profile, preferably increase during storage, and show satisfactory correlation with microbial growth, sensory score and remaining shelf life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research also reports different microbiota present in tilapia at around 4 °C, including Pseudomonas and Vibrio (Xing, Zhang, Liu, Tian, & Hu, ), and Pseudomonas , Aeromonas , and Staphylococcus (Cao, Liu, Yin, & Wu, ). Such differences in the microbiota are likely caused by the diversity of the breeding environment, as described by Boziaris and Parlapani (). Though some differences exist, Pseudomonas spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Lanes 1, 2, 3, and 4 corresponded to fillets stored at 0°C for 6, 12, 18, and 24 days, respectively; lanes 1', 2', 3', 4', 5', 6', 7', and 8' corresponded to fillets stored at -3°C for 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 days, respectively. microbiota are likely caused by the diversity of the breeding environment, as described by Boziaris and Parlapani (2016). Though some differences exist, Pseudomonas spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the time until spoilage occurs, depends on the species and the counts of available microbes (Borch, Kant‐Muermans, & Blixt, ). Boziaris and Parlapani () affirm that spoilage is due to the so‐called specific spoilage organisms, which predominate and form metabolites and thereby alter the organoleptic characteristics of meat, hence making it inappropriate for consumption. This, in the belief of Nattress, Yost, and Baker (), incurs substantial economic losses for both producers and retailers.…”
Section: Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%