Specific relationships between core beliefs and personality disorder symptoms in a non‐clinical sample

Reeves, Mark; Taylor, Jeanette

doi:10.1002/cpp.519

Cited by 61 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(24 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…in this regard in different fields such as antisocial personality, avoidant personality, depressed personality, paranoid personality, dependent personality, borderline personality, and obsessive compulsive personality disorders which reveal a high correlation between early maladaptive schemas and these disorders (Ball & Cecero, 2001;Carr & Francis, 2010;Jovev & Jackson, 2004;Nordahl et al, 2005;Petrocelli, Glaser, Calhoun, & Campbell, 2001;Reeves & Taylor, 2007;Sines, Waller, Meyer, & Wigley, 2008;Specht, Chapman, & Cellucci, 2009). The findings of some researches on eating disorder also represented that the Emotional Deprivation, Social Isolation/Alienation, Defectiveness/Shame, Failure, Dependence/Incompetence, and Subjugation schemas are remarkably high in those patients (Anderson, Rieger, & Caterson, 2006;Leung, Waller, & Thomas, 1999;Moloodi, Dezhkam, Mootabi, & Omidvar, 2010;Riso, du Toit, Stein, & Young, 2007;Van Vlierberghe & Braet, 2007;Voderholzer et al, 2014;Waller, Meyer, & Ohanian, 2001), on the other hand active schemas in people suffering from drug abuse disorder are reported to be Subjugation, Vulnerability to Harm or Illness, and Emotional Inhibition (Ball & Cecero, 2001;Brotchie, Meyer, Copello, Kidney, & Waller, 2004).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Maladaptive Schemas in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders

Yoosefi¹,

RajeziEsfahani²,

Pourshahbaz³

et al. 2016

GJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Purpose of this study is comparing early maladaptive schemas which are active in patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder and anxiety disorders together, considering recent DSM-5 changes through which OCD has been placed in a separate and new diagnostic level.Methodology: This research is a causal-comparative study. 151 persons were categorized in three groups of people suffering from OCD (50), suffering from anxiety disorders (50), and control group (51). Early diagnosis of disorders in two clinical groups were verified based on structured clinical interview for DSM (SCID-I) and Yale-Brown obsessive-compulsive scale (Y-BOCS). General health questionnaire (GHQ-28), the short versions of the Young schemas questionnaire (YSQ), and Padua inventory-Washington State University Revision (PI-WSUR) were also implemented. Findings:Findings revealed that mean scores of all schemas of those suffering from anxiety disorders, except for Self-Sacrifice, Unrelenting-Standards/Hypercriticalness, Entitlement/Grandiosity schemas, and mean scores of all early maladaptive schemas of those suffering from obsessive compulsive disorder are significantly higher than those of control group. OCD group had significantly higher scores in Emotional Deprivation, Mistrust/Abuse, and Defectiveness/Shame schemas than anxiety disorders group. Defectiveness/Shame and Vulnerability to Harm or Illness schemas can explain 38 percent of variance of obsessive compulsive symptoms. Conclusion:The dominant and specific early maladaptive schemas of OCD are Defectiveness/Shame, Mistrust/Abuse, and Emotional Deprivation Schemas. This study besides supporting the theory of early maladaptive schemas, suggests that interventions based on specific schemas can be useful methods in treatment of OCD and anxiety disorders.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Maladaptive Schemas in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders

Yoosefi¹,

RajeziEsfahani²,

Pourshahbaz³

et al. 2016

GJHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because of this variability, these people can activate different EMSs at any given moment (Arntz & Genderen, 2009). Borderline PD often appears to be associated with schemas of the disconnection and rejection domain (Arntz & Genderen, 2009;Ball & Cecero, 2001;Jovev & Jackson, 2004;Reeves & Taylor, 2007). Dependent PD and related traits have mainly been associated with the domain of impaired autonomy and performance (e.g., the dependence schema; Schmidt, 1994) and with the disconnection and rejection domain (e.g., the abandonment schema; Carr & Francis, 2010;Gude, Hoffart, Hedley, & Rø, 2004;Nordahl, Holthe, & Haugum, 2005;Petrocelli, Glaser, Calhoun, & Campbell, 2001;Reeves & Taylor, 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Borderline PD often appears to be associated with schemas of the disconnection and rejection domain (Arntz & Genderen, 2009;Ball & Cecero, 2001;Jovev & Jackson, 2004;Reeves & Taylor, 2007). Dependent PD and related traits have mainly been associated with the domain of impaired autonomy and performance (e.g., the dependence schema; Schmidt, 1994) and with the disconnection and rejection domain (e.g., the abandonment schema; Carr & Francis, 2010;Gude, Hoffart, Hedley, & Rø, 2004;Nordahl, Holthe, & Haugum, 2005;Petrocelli, Glaser, Calhoun, & Campbell, 2001;Reeves & Taylor, 2007). Histrionic PD has been associated with the schema of subjugation within the other-directedness domain (Carr & Francis, 2010) and has been associated negatively with schemas such as mistrust and social isolation of the disconnection and rejection domain (Carr & Francis, 2010;Reeves & Taylor, 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Maladaptive Schemas and Personality Disorder Traits in Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence

Corral

Calvete

2014

Span. J. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Personality disorders (PDs) are highly prevalent among perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). Schema Therapy proposes a number of early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) that are involved in the development of PDs. This study examined the prevalence of PD traits in a sample of men who committed violence against their partners and the relationship between EMSs domains and PD traits. With this aim, a sample of 119 convicted men completed the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form (YSQ-SF; Young & Brown, 1994) and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-III;Millon, Millon, & Davis, 1994). The results showed that the most prevalent PD traits were narcissistic (24.6%), obsessive-compulsive (21.9%), and paranoid (17.5%). These PD traits were linked to several EMSs in ways consistent with the Schema Therapy model. Namely, narcissistic PD traits were positively associated with schemas of the impaired limits domain and were negatively associated with the other-directedness domain. The paranoid PD traits were associated with the disconnection and rejection domain and the impaired autonomy and performance domain. Finally, both borderline and antisocial PD traits were associated with the disconnection and rejection domain and the impaired limits domain. These findings suggest that the assessment and modification of EMSs should be a factor to consider for inclusion in the treatment programs for perpetrators of IPV in order to provide comprehensive intervention of this population.

show abstract

“…found that vulnerability to harm, emotional inhibition, and insuicient self-control were associated with narcissistic personality disorder [39], in their nonclinical sample, Reeves and Taylor found that men endorsed more symptoms of ASPD and higher levels of the core beliefs of emotional deprivation, social isolation, defectiveness/shame, and emotional inhibition [40].…”

Section: Cognitive Behavioral Theory Of Antisocial Personality Disordermentioning

confidence: 92%

Cognitive-Behavioral Theory and Treatment of Antisocial Personality Disorder

Sargin¹,

Özdel²

2017

Psychopathy - New Updates on an Old Phenomenon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) has a distinct cognitive proile according to cognitive theory of personality disorders. Antisocial individuals' view of the world is personal rather than interpersonal. They cannot accept another's point of view over their own. As such, they cannot take on the role of another. Their actions are not based on choices in a social sense because of this cognitive limitation. Cognitive theory of personality disorders conceptualizes personality disorder including the ASPD, according to their basic beliefs or schemas. The content of beliefs can vary in diferent personality disorders. Antisocial patients view themselves as loners, autonomous, and strong. Some of them see themselves as having been abused and mistreated by society and therefore justify victimizing others because they believe that they have been victimized. Their view about other people is very negative; they see others as exploitative and thus deserving of being exploited in retaliation. In this chapter, after overviewing general features of ASPD, we aim to give an explanation how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) conceptualizes personality disorders in general and ASPD in particular and highlight the important implementations of CBT and schema therapy.

show abstract

Specific relationships between core beliefs and personality disorder symptoms in a non‐clinical sample

Cited by 61 publications

References 27 publications

Early Maladaptive Schemas in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders

Early Maladaptive Schemas in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders

Early Maladaptive Schemas and Personality Disorder Traits in Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence

Cognitive-Behavioral Theory and Treatment of Antisocial Personality Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About