2013
DOI: 10.1021/ct400224n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Reaction Path Hamiltonian for Proton Transfer in Water: Reparameterized Semiempirical Models

Abstract: The semiempirical MNDO-based AM1 and PM3 methods and the orthogonalization-corrected OM1, OM2, and OM3 models were reparameterized to improve their description of bulk water and of proton transfer in water. Reference data included the gas-phase geometries and energies of the water molecule, small water clusters, the hydronium ion, and small hydronium ion-water clusters, as well as the gas-phase potential energy surface for proton transfer between the two water molecules in a Zundel ion, all calculated at the M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods do not provide accurate results for proton transfer reactions in water, primarily because they all underestimate the binding energy between water molecules. As a consequence, the first shell coordination numbers of the hydrated proton are too high, and the Zundel complex is overstabilized . Therefore, reparameterization is essential, as was done by Wu et al for the MNDO and OM n methods, and Goyal et al for the SCC‐DFTB method .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these methods do not provide accurate results for proton transfer reactions in water, primarily because they all underestimate the binding energy between water molecules. As a consequence, the first shell coordination numbers of the hydrated proton are too high, and the Zundel complex is overstabilized . Therefore, reparameterization is essential, as was done by Wu et al for the MNDO and OM n methods, and Goyal et al for the SCC‐DFTB method .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, ab initio simulations have provided important atomistic insights into the transfer mechanism of hydrated protons, which can be used for developing and parameterizing more approximate approaches. In an effort to gain efficiency, while preserving the detailed description of the excess proton, approaches based on semiempirical methods and hybrid quantum/classical protocols have been proposed …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the size and time scales inherent to quantum approaches, semi‐empirical simulations have been performed to study proton transfer reactions in water clusters,, and QM/MM approaches have been used to model an excess proton in water and enzymatic activity ,. The need of a multistate description in such complex environments has led to extensions of the empirical valence‐bond (EVB) model pioneered by Warshel and co‐workers, notably to address proton transport in water ,.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is to designate all water molecules that may enter the solvation shell as QM, but doing so significantly increases the size of the QM subsystem and the associated computational costs. Alternatively, one may prohibit solvent exchange during simulations, e.g., by imposing certain constraints or restraints to the boundary between the solvation shell and the bulk water . However, doing so substantially limits the scope of the simulations, because many properties, such as diffusion coefficients, will not be properly calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%