2020
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Mutations in APC, but Not Alterations in DNA Damage Response, Associate With Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Wang F et al showed that wild type APC activated lncRNA (lncRNA-APC1) was down-regulated in CRC compared with normal colorectal tissues and inhibited cell growth, angiogenesis and metastasis [16] . However, APC mutation but not APC down-expression was found in most sporadic CRC [25,26] , and APC mutation was one of the most important inducer for CRC tumorigenesis and progression [27] . In the present study, we demonstrated that mutated APC protein mediated stabilization of β-catenin protein promotes the transcription of SURC via binding to its promoter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The study by Wang F et al showed that wild type APC activated lncRNA (lncRNA-APC1) was down-regulated in CRC compared with normal colorectal tissues and inhibited cell growth, angiogenesis and metastasis [16] . However, APC mutation but not APC down-expression was found in most sporadic CRC [25,26] , and APC mutation was one of the most important inducer for CRC tumorigenesis and progression [27] . In the present study, we demonstrated that mutated APC protein mediated stabilization of β-catenin protein promotes the transcription of SURC via binding to its promoter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To expand our data, we downloaded a CRC cohort for chemotherapy (Mondaca-CRC; https://www.cbioportal.org/study/clinicalData?id=crc_apc_impact_2020 ) from the cbioportal web tool ( Mondaca et al, 2020 ), as well as the entirety of the exon sequencing data and clinical data (including Tumor mutational burden (TMB), Microsatellite instability (MSI) scores, MSI status, gender, TNM stage, ECOG and age). We downloaded the RNA sequencing data, mutation data, and clinical prognosis data of TCGA-COAD and TCGA-READ from TCGA database ( https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/ ) using TCGAbiolinks R package ( Colaprico et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first examined the gene mutations and their frequency of occurrence as a function of colorectal cancer clinicopathologic parameters using seven clinical colorectal cancer studies (2,575 samples) in cBioportal [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . Across the seven studies surveyed in cBioportal, the percentage of samples in which somatic mutations in APC occurred was 69.6%, with a corresponding frequency of 13.7% for samples with BRAF mutations.…”
Section: Analysis Of Apc and Braf Gene Mutations In Crc Using Cbioportalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This source was used to investigate common gene mutations found in patients with CRC. A total of 7 studies (n=2,575) covering colorectal adenocarcinoma, metastatic colorectal cancer, colon adenocarcinoma, and colon cancer were explored, and a list of frequent mutated genes was generated [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . Additionally, using the same seven studies, the APC/BRAF gene pairing was selected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%