“…18 to be appropriate for MgCl 2 , MnCl 2 and CdCl 2 , respectively.A comparison of the heat capacities of CuCl 2 and MCl 2 (M=Mg, Mn, Cd) reveals significant short-range ordering magnetic contributions to the heat capacity of CuCl 2 up to ∼ 100 K, as already concluded by Stout et al and Billerey3,18 .In order to construct a lattice heat capacity reference for CuCl 2 from the heat capacities of MgCl 2 , MnCl 2 and CdCl 2 , we tried various combinations of the heat capacities of MgCl 2 , MnCl 2 and CdCl 2 with temperatures scaled by the factors given above and subtracted these from the total heat capacity of CuCl 2 . The resulting magnetic heat capacity of CuCl 2 , C mag /T was subsequently integrated and the total magnetic entropy was compared with Rln2, the entropy expected for a S=1/2 magnetic system as a crosscheck.Due to the very large deviations of the heat capacity of MgCl 2 from that of CuCl 2 , especially in the temperature regime below ∼ 50K where magnetic contributions are essential we discarded MgCl 2 and achieved an adequate lattice heat capacity reference by averaging for each temperature the heat capacities of MnCl 2 and CdCl 2 .The magnetic heat capacity of CuCl 2 obtained after subtracting the phonon contributions is shown in Figure20(b) and (c).…”