2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.89.257001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Heat of Single CrystalMgB2: A Two-Band Superconductor with Two Different Anisotropies

Abstract: Heat-capacity measurements of a 39 microg MgB2 single crystal in fields up to 14 T and below 3 K allow the determination of the low-temperature linear term of the specific heat, its field dependence, and its anisotropy. Our results are compatible with two-band superconductivity, the band carrying the smaller gap being isotropic, that carrying the larger gap having an anisotropy of approximately 5. Three different upper critical fields are thus needed to describe the superconducting state of MgB2.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
135
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
20
135
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observe that the fit of H c2 is basi-cally unchanged above 1 T, meaning that low fields suppress the superconductivity due to the light electron band restoring a "single band" superconducting state. This is the same effect observed more directly in MgB 2 with specific heat measurements under magnetic field : the smaller gap rapidly vanishes, leading to a finite density of states at the Fermi level under magnetic fields due to the π band 36 . This suppression of the light quasiparticle superconductivity would have here an effect on specific heat too small to be observed (contribution of the light quasiparticles to the specific heat of order 4% of the Sommerfeld coefficient, itself buried in the large Schottky anomaly).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We also observe that the fit of H c2 is basi-cally unchanged above 1 T, meaning that low fields suppress the superconductivity due to the light electron band restoring a "single band" superconducting state. This is the same effect observed more directly in MgB 2 with specific heat measurements under magnetic field : the smaller gap rapidly vanishes, leading to a finite density of states at the Fermi level under magnetic fields due to the π band 36 . This suppression of the light quasiparticle superconductivity would have here an effect on specific heat too small to be observed (contribution of the light quasiparticles to the specific heat of order 4% of the Sommerfeld coefficient, itself buried in the large Schottky anomaly).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…3]. These exercises suggest that the difference in the gap value of each band in this system is less substantial than the case of MgB 2 [28,29,30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In particular, the two-gap superconductivity in MgB 2 manifests itself in the unusual temperature dependence of the anisotropy of H c1 in the superconducting state [28,29,30]. However, the reliable measurement of the lower critical field is a difficult task, in particular when strong vortex pinning is present as in the case of Fe-arsenides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curvature predicted for an isotropic gap 28 seems to be significant only at higher fields. However, for MgB 2 there is a relatively sharp bend in γ v (H) vs H that is associated with different values of H c2 for the two bands 31 , and perhaps an effect of that kind, but with a smaller difference in the values of H c2 , could be at work here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%