1981
DOI: 10.1139/f81-145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Growth Rates of Freshwater Algae in Relation to Cell Size and Light Intensity

Abstract: Four species of freshwater green algae spanning a size range of 0.83–325.22 pg carbon per cell were grown in laboratory batch cultures under four levels of incident irradiance. There was an inverse relationship between cell size and specific growth rate at the highest light intensity tested. As light intensity was decreased, the relationship weakened. These laboratory results, in addition to some field data from arctic lakes in Canada, support recent model predictions concerning size-dependent algal growth.Key… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
55
3
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
55
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, release from deep mixing and from grazing by mesozooplankton would not have been sufficient for permitting positive growth rates of medium-sized phytoplankton, even if those factors had contributed to their scarcity in situ. On the other hand, growth rates attained by the combination of a full nutrient enrichment and maximal grazer exclusion were not much lower than the maximal growth rates for phytoplankton of the nanoplankton and smaller microplankton size range reported in the literature (Schlesinger et al 1981, Banse 1982), e.g. Rhizoselenia (15 000 + 34 700 pm3 cell volume) had growth rates of 0.9 to 1.3 d-' at 21 to 23°C , while Banse's equation for diatoms predicts a maximal growth rate of 1.32 d-' at 20°C.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Therefore, release from deep mixing and from grazing by mesozooplankton would not have been sufficient for permitting positive growth rates of medium-sized phytoplankton, even if those factors had contributed to their scarcity in situ. On the other hand, growth rates attained by the combination of a full nutrient enrichment and maximal grazer exclusion were not much lower than the maximal growth rates for phytoplankton of the nanoplankton and smaller microplankton size range reported in the literature (Schlesinger et al 1981, Banse 1982), e.g. Rhizoselenia (15 000 + 34 700 pm3 cell volume) had growth rates of 0.9 to 1.3 d-' at 21 to 23°C , while Banse's equation for diatoms predicts a maximal growth rate of 1.32 d-' at 20°C.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…There are also reports of sizedependent μ max with the size-scaling exponent of μ max being greater than -1 ⁄ 4 (Banse 1982, Blasco et al 1982, Tang 1995. Data on μ max compliled by Schlesinger et al (1981) show a lower size-scaling exponent of -0.32. If picoplankton-sized cells are included, the largest μ max is found in intermediate-sized cells, rather than in smallest cells (Raven 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many ecological and physiological characteristics of phytoplankton, such as light absorption (Agustí 1991, Finkel 2001, Fujiki & Taguchi 2002, photosynthesis (Finkel & Irwin 2000, Finkel et al 2004, nutrient uptake (Pasciak & Gavis 1974, Aksnes & Egge 1991, Hein et al 1995, Sunda & Huntsman 1997, Litchman et al 2007, sinking rate (Smayda 1970, Waite et al 1997 and metabolic and growth rate (Banse 1976, 1982, Schlesinger et al 1981, Blasco et al 1982, Geider et al 1986, Tang 1995, Tang & Peters 1995, are related to cell size. Phytoplankton cell size also determines the size of their grazers, since zooplankton of different sizes graze on prey of certain preferred size ranges (Hansen et al 1994, Weitz & Levin 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size also influences how planktonic organisms relate to their hydrodynamic environment (Koehl and Strickler 1981;Monger and Landry 1990), as well as how they partition nutrients (Eppley et al 1969;Moloney and Field 1989), growth (Schlesinger et al 1981;Tang 1995;Nielsen 2006), respiratory losses (Banse 1976;Tang and Peters 1995), and other metabolic processes (Joint and Pomroy 1988;Joint 1991;Gillooly et al 2001) among the coinhabitants and potential competitors in a given environment. An understanding of size-specific processes is, therefore, important for understanding planktonic ecosystem dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%