The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45578-7_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Filtering Algorithms for Over-Constrained Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the soft-all-different(T) is associated with the violation measure µ var , defined as the number of variables in T that have to change their value to satisfy that all values are different. Another violation measure for softall-different is µ dec , defined as the number of pairs of variables in T with the same value [14].…”
Section: Optimization Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the soft-all-different(T) is associated with the violation measure µ var , defined as the number of variables in T that have to change their value to satisfy that all values are different. Another violation measure for softall-different is µ dec , defined as the number of pairs of variables in T with the same value [14].…”
Section: Optimization Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Costs coming from non-global constraints are calculated as usual, aggregating all non-global constraint costs evaluated on self value and the assignments of the current context (lines [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). Costs coming from global constraints are calculated in lines [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Although there is no need to separate non-global from global cost aggregation, (1) procedure CalculateCost(value) (2) cost = cost + NonGlobalCostWithValue(value); (3) cost = cost + GlobalCostWithValue(value); (4) return cost; (5) function NonGlobalCostWithValue(value) (6) cost = 0; (7) for each nonGlobal ∈ nonGlobalConstraintSet do (8) assignments = new list(); assignments.add(self, value); (9) for each (xi , di ) ∈ context do (10) if xi ∈ nonGlobal.vars then assignments.add(xi, di); we have presented them in separate procedures for a better understanding of the new modifications.…”
Section: Search With Bnb-adopt +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft global constraints are associated with a violation measure that defines the costs of value assignments. For example, the soft-alldifferent(T) is associated with the violation measure µ var (the number of variables in T that have to change their value to satisfy that all are different), or with µ dec (the number of pairs of variables in T with the same value [14]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique relies on the variable based violation cost introduced in [27,24]. This cost was advocated as a generic way for expressing the violation of a global constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cost was advocated as a generic way for expressing the violation of a global constraint. However, algorithms were only provided for the soft alldifferent constraint [27]. We come up with an algorithm for computing a sharp bound of the minimum violation cost and with a filtering algorithm for pruning in order to avoid to exceed a given maximum violation cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%