2009
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00604-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific Detection of Viable Legionella Cells by Combined Use of Photoactivated Ethidium Monoazide and PCR/Real-Time PCR

Abstract: Legionella organisms are prevalent in manmade water systems and cause legionellosis in humans. A rapid detection method for viable Legionella cells combining ethidium monoazide (EMA) and PCR/real-time PCR was assessed. EMA could specifically intercalate and cleave the genomic DNA of heat-and chlorine-treated dead Legionella cells. The EMA-PCR assay clearly showed an amplified fragment specific for Legionella DNA from viable cells, but it could not do so for DNA from dead cells. The number of EMA-treated dead L… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
60
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique was initially employed by Nogva et al (43) and Rudi et al (55,56) to differentiate between viable and dead cells of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni. Since then, the EMA-qPCR approach has been used to discriminately quantify viable cells of other bacterial types (8,41,51,57,64). The standardized protocol initially established by Nogva et al (43) and Rudi et al (55,56) was not suitable to effectively discriminate live from dead Legionella cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was initially employed by Nogva et al (43) and Rudi et al (55,56) to differentiate between viable and dead cells of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni. Since then, the EMA-qPCR approach has been used to discriminately quantify viable cells of other bacterial types (8,41,51,57,64). The standardized protocol initially established by Nogva et al (43) and Rudi et al (55,56) was not suitable to effectively discriminate live from dead Legionella cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMA-treated DNA is not a target for amplification by PCR, and therefore viable Legionella are selectively detected by PCR when combined with EMA treatment. The effect of EMA treatment on Legionella detection by PCR has been published Chang et al, 2009;Chen et al, 2010;Delgado-Viscogliosi et al, 2009;Qin et al, 2012 . In this paper, we report a comparison of the detection of Legionella spp. by the plate culture method, quantitative PCR qPCR method and qPCR method in combination with EMA treatment EMA-qPCR .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, PCR in clinical applications may have a higher PPV (than for environmental samples) despite the lower sensitivity with nonrespiratory specimens (379). Two potential remedies for the low PPV with samples from environmental sources include reverse transcription-PCR, amplifying labile RNA targets present in metabolically active bacteria, and the use of a cell-impermeant chemical, such as ethidium monoazide (EMA) or propidium monoazide (PMA), to inhibit PCR amplification from nonviable cells or extracellular nucleic acids (385)(386)(387)(388)(389)(390). Notably, neither alternative protocol alone will discriminate VBNC legionellae; however, this cell population still poses a potential human health risk (391)(392)(393)(394).…”
Section: Nucleic Acid-based Molecular Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%