2002
DOI: 10.1017/s1355838202026080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific degradation of 3??? regions of GUS mRNA in posttranscriptionally silenced tobacco lines may be related to 5???-3??? spreading of silencing

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we believe that 3# to 5# spreading over longer distances cannot be excluded because detection of secondary siRNAs was performed 1 week after PVX-U inoculation, thus leaving the possibility that, after a longer period, siRNAs could have spread further along the gus mRNA into the G region. Moreover, the G region might not allow transitivity because it has been shown to be a weak target (English et al, 1996;Braunstein et al, 2002) and it does not give rise to primary siRNAs (Hutvagner et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we believe that 3# to 5# spreading over longer distances cannot be excluded because detection of secondary siRNAs was performed 1 week after PVX-U inoculation, thus leaving the possibility that, after a longer period, siRNAs could have spread further along the gus mRNA into the G region. Moreover, the G region might not allow transitivity because it has been shown to be a weak target (English et al, 1996;Braunstein et al, 2002) and it does not give rise to primary siRNAs (Hutvagner et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this organism, spreading of silencing is not limited to transgenic targets, but endogenous transcripts can also be used as template for amplification (Sijen et al, 2001;Alder et al, 2003). In plants, transitive silencing can occur in both the 3# to 5# and the 5# to 3# direction along transgenic target RNAs in a primer-dependent or primer-independent manner (Braunstein et al, 2002;Vaistij et al, 2002;Himber et al, 2003;Van Houdt et al, 2003;Kościań ska et al, 2005;Miki et al, 2005;Petersen and Albrechtsen, 2005). Virus-induced gene silencing has been shown to spread over a distance of at least 1,000 nt from the 5# end to the 3# end of the target mRNA, while 3# to 5# spreading can extend at least through 332 nt, with a possible limit of 600 nt (Vaistij et al, 2002;Petersen and Albrechtsen, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also some indication that RNA silencing can expand across target RNAs and to regions downstream of the primary genome target [20,57,187]. Since transitive RNAi has been reported in plant, invertebrate and vertebrate systems, it is likely that this phenomenon is more widespread than what has been reported but the lack of studies in this area has hampered our knowledge on how widespread the phenomenon of transitive RNAi is.…”
Section: Transgenic Rnaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These newly synthesized siRNAs can target other RNAs on the basis of sequence similarity. In plants, it has been shown that siRNA spreads not only in the 3# to 5# direction but also in the 5# to 3# direction when the green fluorescent protein (gfp) or b-glucuronidase (gus) transgenes are targets of RNA silencing (Braunstein et al, 2002;Klahre et al, 2002;Vaistij et al, 2002;Himber et al, 2003;Van Houdt et al, 2003;Garcia-Perez et al, 2004). However, other reports have shown a lack of such transitive RNA silencing for transgenes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%