The activities of two groups of cyclic agonists of substance P (SP) have been studied. The disulfide bridge constraints have been designed on the basis of conformational studies on SP and physalaemin indicating an a-helical structure for the core of these two tachykinins (group I) and a folding of the C-terminal carboxamide towards the side chains of the glutamines 5 and 6 (group II). Only peptides simulating the a-helix present substantial potencies. [Cys3,6JSP is as active as SP in inhibiting '25I-labeled Bolton and Hunter SP-specific binding on rat brain synaptosomes and on dog carotid bioassay, two assays specific for the neurokinin 1 receptor. Moreover, [Cys3,6]SP is as potent as neurokinin B in inhibiting 125I-labeled Bolton and Hunter eledoisin-specific binding on rat cortical synaptosomes as well as in stimulating rat portal vein, two tests specific for the neurokinin 3 receptor. Interestingly, in contrast to neurokinin B, [Cys3,6JSP is a weak agonist of the neurokinin 2 receptor subtype, as evidenced by its binding potency in inhibiting 3H-labeled neurokinin A-specific binding on rat duodenum and in inducing the contractions of the rabbit pulmonary artery, a neurokinin 2-type bioassay. To increase the specificity of the cyclic analogue [Cys3"6]SP positions 8 and 9 were modified. [Cys3'6,Tyr8,Ala9SP is slightly less selective than SP for the neurokinin 1 receptor subtype. [Cys2,5]neurokinin B constitutes a selective cyclic agonist for the neurokinin 3 receptor. The very weak potencies of the peptides from group II indicate that a certain degree of flexibility in the C-terminal moiety is required. Collectively, these results suggest that the neurokinin 1 and neurokinin 3 tachykinin receptors may recognize a similar three-dimensional structure of the core of the tachykinins. Different orientations of the common Cterminal tripeptide may be related to the selectivity for the different receptor subtypes.Conformational analyses of tachykinins (Table 1) were first done on the substance P(5-11) fragment because an earlier report indicated a crucial role of the C-terminal hexapeptides of substance P (SP) and eledoisin (ELE) for spasmogenic activity on the guinea pig ileum (1). Conformational energy calculations have been conducted using both SP and SP(5-11) (2-4). The most stable predicted conformations exhibit a turn around either the Gly-9 and Phe-8 or Phe-7 and Phe-8 residues leading to a spatial proximity of the C-terminal methionine and of the glutamine side chains (2-7). However, we have demonstrated the existence in the rat brain (8, 9) and spinal cord (10) of a specific binding site for SP that requires the whole sequence of SP for full binding potency. This result was further confirmed by several groups (11-13). This observation led us to study the conformational behavior of the undecapeptide in different solvents using NMR and CD spectroscopies. The main features of the conformational model deduced from this study were the flexibility of the