2013
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific airway resistance in children: Panting or tidal breathing?

Abstract: Tidal breathing is associated with an overestimation of sRaw compared with panting in children. Although the latter results in small increase throughout the panting maneuver, sRaw(p) is probably more trustful than sRaw(tb).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study included records from 40 asthmatic and 25 healthy children aged 6.5–11. All but 10 healthy controls have been included in a recently published study . The characteristics of the population are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The study included records from 40 asthmatic and 25 healthy children aged 6.5–11. All but 10 healthy controls have been included in a recently published study . The characteristics of the population are reported in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may express firstly the relative increase in random noise in the breathing signals. More importantly, some residual looping between ΔV plet and V' may be observed during panting, although significantly reduced compared with tidal breathing . There may be several explanations for this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This occurred despite striking lack of agreement with respect to methodology, outcomes and reference data. Variation in several of these important methodological aspects can significantly affect recorded sR aw values [8,11] and interpretation in the clinical setting [12]. Publication of recommendations in 2010 for testing protocol using the most common device in our survey has failed to prevent marked variation in practice [8].…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 96%