2022
DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciesism in everyday language

Abstract: The methods, data, and analysis script are available via the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nzsr3/).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, given exactly the same information, participants' beliefs about animals came to be more inaccurate and more skewed towards believing they did not have minds compared to their beliefs about humans. These findings align with work that documents the tendency to deny animals' minds (Bastian and Loughnan, 2017;Bastian et al, 2012;Loughnan & Davies, 2020) and to represent them as less worthy of moral concern compared to humans (Caviola et al, 2018(Caviola et al, , 2022Leach et al, 2022).…”
Section: Evidence For the Systematic Underestimation Of Animal Mindssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…That is, given exactly the same information, participants' beliefs about animals came to be more inaccurate and more skewed towards believing they did not have minds compared to their beliefs about humans. These findings align with work that documents the tendency to deny animals' minds (Bastian and Loughnan, 2017;Bastian et al, 2012;Loughnan & Davies, 2020) and to represent them as less worthy of moral concern compared to humans (Caviola et al, 2018(Caviola et al, , 2022Leach et al, 2022).…”
Section: Evidence For the Systematic Underestimation Of Animal Mindssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Study 3 also examined a potentially-important moderator, namely, whether the accuracy of peoples' beliefs depends on if the animal is culturally-defined as a source of food or as a companion (Bastian et al, 2012;Bratanova et al, 2011). Informed by our prior findings and work that documents beliefs about humans' supremacy over animals (Caviola et al, 2018;Dunayer, 2004;Herzog, 2010;Joy, 2010;Leach, Kitchin, et al, 2022;Singer, 1975Singer, , 2009, we again predicted that participants would show a tendency to underestimate the minds of pigs. In addition, work highlighting the tendency for people to anthropomorphize companion animals (Bartz et al, 2016;Waytz, Morewedge, et al, 2010) led us to predict that participants would overestimate dog minds, and that this overestimation would be greater than equivalent tendency for pigs.…”
Section: Study 3: Validating Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations