2016
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtw143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species traits and shoot-root biomass allocation in 20 dry-grassland species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiment, R/S values were generally well above 1 irrespective of the species, suggesting a genetically-fixed higher biomass allocation to roots in species adapted to infertile environments (Aerts and Chapin, 2000;Chapin, 1980;Lambers et al, 2008) or with severe water shortage (Fernández and Reynolds, 2000;Lambers et al, 2008;Padilla et al, 2009;Wright and Westoby, 1999). It is worth note that R/S changes with plant development, as seedlings allocate more biomass to roots (Gedroc et al, 1996), and therefore our results may be consequence of differences in plant size (Husáková et al, 2018). In our dataset, however, there was true plasticity (sensu Weiner, 2004) in Adansonia digitata, although Faidherbia albida showed plasticity regarding within W-treatments and Tamarindus indica in N-treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In our experiment, R/S values were generally well above 1 irrespective of the species, suggesting a genetically-fixed higher biomass allocation to roots in species adapted to infertile environments (Aerts and Chapin, 2000;Chapin, 1980;Lambers et al, 2008) or with severe water shortage (Fernández and Reynolds, 2000;Lambers et al, 2008;Padilla et al, 2009;Wright and Westoby, 1999). It is worth note that R/S changes with plant development, as seedlings allocate more biomass to roots (Gedroc et al, 1996), and therefore our results may be consequence of differences in plant size (Husáková et al, 2018). In our dataset, however, there was true plasticity (sensu Weiner, 2004) in Adansonia digitata, although Faidherbia albida showed plasticity regarding within W-treatments and Tamarindus indica in N-treatments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Meanwhile, increasing temperature had little impact on shoot/root resource allocation pattern (Figure 4). Plants usually allocate more resources to the organs that suffer more selection pressures and constraints (Husáková et al, 2018). The carbon fixation and nutrient acquisition can both limit plant growth under increased temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second species, cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) was included, a bioenergy plant that can produce similar aboveground biomass as maize (Gansberger et al 2015) but has a higher root:shoot ratio. As cup plant is a perennial plant, it likely transfers more C belowground and exudes more organic substances than maize (Husáková et al 2018;Pausch and Kuzyakov 2018). In all treatments, the N supply was scheduled to assure that at the end of the pre-cultivation phase, the soils were equally depleted in plant available N. With respect to background N supply, this permitted nearly equal starting conditions for the subsequent stable isotope labeling experiment.…”
Section: Experimental Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of rhizodeposited C and its quality depend on plant species, age, and development (Gransee and Wittenmayer 2000;Vancura 1964;Vancura and Hovadik 1965), and plant nutrient status (Carvalhais et al 2011). In general, younger plants translocate a higher share of assimilated C belowground than mature plants (Kuzyakov and Domanski 2000;Nguyen 2003), and perennial plants translocate a higher share of assimilated C belowground than annual plants (Husáková et al 2018;Pausch and Kuzyakov 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%