Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00986.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species specificity of resistance to oxygen diffusion in thin cuticular membranes from amphibious plants

Abstract: Cuticular membranes (CM) were isolated enzymatically from leaves of amphibious and submerged plants, and the oxygen permeability of aerial and aquatic CMs was compared using a specially constructed oxygen electrode. Their thicknesses were estimated from transmission electron micrographs of intact leaves. When dry CMs were moistened, the permeability of typical aerial CMs changed differently from that of typical aquatic CMs during the desiccation, apparently reflecting different internal structures. The cuticle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4a) will mainly be explained by a difference in cuticle thickness (Fig. 2, a, b, and d) and its putative decrease in resistance (Frost-Christensen et al, 2003). The differences in CO 2 affinity between the leaf types were not related to boundary layer effects, since boundary layers were minimal and similar in the leaf discs in the well-stirred cuvette.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4a) will mainly be explained by a difference in cuticle thickness (Fig. 2, a, b, and d) and its putative decrease in resistance (Frost-Christensen et al, 2003). The differences in CO 2 affinity between the leaf types were not related to boundary layer effects, since boundary layers were minimal and similar in the leaf discs in the well-stirred cuvette.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is most obvious from the underwater photosynthetic performance at low CO 2 since affinity for CO 2 is the combined result of all diffusional resistances over the leaf, although it can also be affected by biochemical limitations (Centritto et al, 2003). Under water, cuticle resistance is considered to be an important factor determining CO 2 affinity (Frost-Christensen et al, 2003). Cuticle resistance is determined by its thickness and the chemical composition of waxes and cutin (Lequeu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regardless of the mechanism responsible for the conversion of HCO { 3 to CO 2 , it is clear that physicochemical processes can limit the supply of carbon to HCO { 3 -using macrophytes and that these processes will control the photosynthesis rate at low velocity when the CO 2 is supplied predominantly through diffusive rather than advective transport. There are a few mechanisms, however, that may explain the drop in O 2 flux: CO 2 diffusing out of the leaf and into the CO 2 -depleted CBL downstream of the leading edge, which may occur through the increase in CO 2 concentration within the leaf as a result of carbonconcentrating mechanisms (Frost-Christensen et al 2003;Madsen and Maberly 2003) and/or extruded H + may be advected away, which would reduce the ability of the leaf to either acidify the water overlying the surface or decrease the rate of HCO { 3 cotransport (Prins and Elezenga 1989;Madsen and Maberly 2003). Moreover, it is relevant to note that uncertainties in the pH measurement as well as the value of the dissociation constant (pK a ) used will cause the [CO 2 ] to vary (15 to 30 mmol m 23 for pK a ranging from 6.1 to 6.3).…”
Section: Time Scale Of Nutrient Diffusion and Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such difference is that aquatic leaves have a thinner cuticle, which decreases the resistance to gas diffusion at the leaf surface (Frost-Christensen et al 2003;Mommer et al 2005a). A second difference is that aquatic leaves tend to have larger intercellular spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%