1991
DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.19.5253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species-specific patterns of DNA bending and sequence

Abstract: Nucleotide sequences in the GenEMBL database were analyzed using strategies designed to reveal species-specific patterns of DNA bending and DNA sequence. The results uncovered striking species-dependent patterns of bending with more variations among individual organisms than between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The frequency of bent sites in sequences from different bacteria was related to genomic A + T content and this relationship was confirmed by electrophoretic analysis of genomic DNA. However, base composi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5B) is consistent with two possible explanations, the first of which is operational (a bias in preparation or amplification/sequencing of nucleosome cores that might recapitulate the strong underlying 10.n periodicity in the C. elegans genome) (McGhee and Felsenfeld 1983) and the second of which is fundamental (significant rotational constraint of nucleosomes on the DNA template). As the parameters for rotational and translational constraint in positioning of nucleosomes become clear, it will be of particular interest to compare these with the large number of potential nucleosome positioning guide sequences that have been detected bioinformatically in the C. elegans genome (VanWye et al 1991;Widom 1996;Fukushima et al 2002;Cohanim et al 2006;Kumar et al 2006). …”
Section: Genome Research 1513mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5B) is consistent with two possible explanations, the first of which is operational (a bias in preparation or amplification/sequencing of nucleosome cores that might recapitulate the strong underlying 10.n periodicity in the C. elegans genome) (McGhee and Felsenfeld 1983) and the second of which is fundamental (significant rotational constraint of nucleosomes on the DNA template). As the parameters for rotational and translational constraint in positioning of nucleosomes become clear, it will be of particular interest to compare these with the large number of potential nucleosome positioning guide sequences that have been detected bioinformatically in the C. elegans genome (VanWye et al 1991;Widom 1996;Fukushima et al 2002;Cohanim et al 2006;Kumar et al 2006). …”
Section: Genome Research 1513mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the C. elegans genome can be readily modified by transgenesis (introduction of foreign DNA in a variety of contexts) or by mutation. These manipulations, combined with an unusually high incidence of putative nucleosomal positioning cues in a fraction of the genome (e.g., VanWye et al 1991;Widom 1996;Fukushima et al 2002;Cohanim et al 2006;Fire et al 2006;Kumar et al 2006;MorenoHerrero et al 2006) should eventually facilitate the experimental analysis of connections between DNA sequence, nucleosome dynamics, and genetic function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, well-characterized model systems such as Caenorhabditis elegans provide a tool of considerable value. C. elegans has been reported to exhibit a strong $10-base periodicity signal (e.g., VanWye et al 1991;Widom 1996;Fukushima et al 2002) and is among the most extensively characterized both in structure (a complete sequence) and function (both individual genetic studies and whole-genome expression/phenotype analysis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENDS ratio values of 1.15 or higher were defined as indicative of bent DNA elements in the Bacillus thuringiensis chromosome, for which an average of eight ENDS ratio values yielding a mean greater than 1.2 for each 10-kb segment has been reported (35). However, ENDS ratio values lower than 1.10 were reported for the Xenopus laevis ribosomal intergenic sequence (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%