2008
DOI: 10.1177/0960327107087910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species-specific differences in coumarin-induced hepatotoxicity as an example toxicogenomics-based approach to assessing risk of toxicity to humans

Abstract: One expected result from toxicogenomics technology is to overcome the barrier because of species-specific differences in prediction of clinical toxicity using animals. The present study serves as a model case to test if the well-known species-specific difference in the toxicity of coumarin could be elucidated using comprehensive gene expression data from rat in-vivo, rat in-vitro, and human in-vitro systems. Coumarin 150 mg/kg produced obvious pathological changes in the liver of rats after repeated a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microarray analysis was conducted on three out of five samples for each group using RG230 2.0 probe arrays (Affymetrix). The procedure was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol as previously reported (Uehara et al ., , ) and the obtained image files were analyzed with the Affymetrix data suite system, Microarray Suite 5.0 (MAS 5.0). The derived signal values were globally normalized and targeted to all probe sets equal to 500 before comparative analysis to examine gene expression differences between treatment and control samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microarray analysis was conducted on three out of five samples for each group using RG230 2.0 probe arrays (Affymetrix). The procedure was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol as previously reported (Uehara et al ., , ) and the obtained image files were analyzed with the Affymetrix data suite system, Microarray Suite 5.0 (MAS 5.0). The derived signal values were globally normalized and targeted to all probe sets equal to 500 before comparative analysis to examine gene expression differences between treatment and control samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the capability to maintain liver native functions for only few days (about three days) under conventional cell culture conditions, together with tissue shortage and its high variability, have limited the establishment of 2D primary hepatocyte cell culture and consequently the use of these cells in the development of liver models (Guillouzo and Guguen-Guillouzo, 2008; Mazzoleni and Steimberg, 2012; Mueller et al, 2013; Soldatow et al, 2013). Primary rodent hepatocytes have been widely exploited in drug testing and drug-drug interaction studies, but the translation of the obtained results to humans is made difficult by differences in metabolism among the two species (Uehara et al, 2008; Lauer et al, 2009). On the other hand, human immortalized hepatic cancer cell lines, such as HepG2, show unlimited availability and maintain certain liver functions, e.g., albumin production (Mueller et al, 2013).…”
Section: In Vitro Liver Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, species-specific differences in xenobiotic metabolism necessitate the use of human hepatocytes in preclinical pharmaceutical development (Hewitt et al, 2001;lauer et al, 2009;Uehara et al, 2008). In particular, human cells most faithfully replicate actual human pharmaco-(and toxico-) kinetics and drug (chemical) metabolism.…”
Section: Cell Sources For In Vitro Liver Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%