2011
DOI: 10.3159/torrey-d-10-00011.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species shifts in response to climate change: Individual or shared responses?1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species responses may become increasingly divergent as the magnitude of climate change increases (Pucko et al 2011). Experimental studies have been increasingly used to help understand and predict these responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species responses may become increasingly divergent as the magnitude of climate change increases (Pucko et al 2011). Experimental studies have been increasingly used to help understand and predict these responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some predictions of biotic responses to climate rely on envelope models (Pearson and Dawson 2003). While substantial work and debate focuses on bioclimate envelope modeling to predict species distributions (Busby 1991;Pearson and Dawson 2003;Elith and Leathwick 2009;Dainese 2012), few studies explore the issue of compositional responses of ecosystems to climate change, particularly at the floristic level (Baselga and Araújo 2009; Pucko et al 2011;Friggens et al 2012). Halpin (1997) showed that when the envelope of climatic conditions describing the distribution of an ecosystem no longer exists at a location, the ecosystem contracts and eventually disappears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogenization of the spatial components of species diversity would be an anticipated consequence of synchronous upslope movement of forest species, as might be predicted from expectations of climate warming alone, but we found little evidence for coordinated upslope shifts in species ranges (Figure ). Rather, shifts in elevational range and density appeared less cohesive and unique to individual species (e.g., Pucko, Beckage, Perkins, & Keeton, ; Wason & Dovciak, ), with higher densities of common low‐elevation species such as F. grandifolia occupying the temperate–boreal ecotone (TBE) while high‐elevation species such as P. rubens have expanded downslope, both contributing to increased homogenization and decreased separation of community composition along the elevational gradient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%