2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2007.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species selectivity of small-molecular antagonists for the CCR5 chemokine receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because maraviroc does not bind to murine CCR5 21-23 , we used CCR5 knock-in mice expressing human CCR5 (h-CCR5ki) for pharmacological studies and immunohistochemical analyses of CCR5-expressing cells. After 18 days of hypoxia, the h-CCR5ki mice had similar PH severity to that in WT mice and showed large increases in lung CCR5 protein levels (Figure 4A) and CCR5 staining in the PA-SMC layer of remodeled vessels (Figure 4B), whereas CCR5 staining in PA-ECs and macrophages was less affected by PH development (Figure 4C and D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because maraviroc does not bind to murine CCR5 21-23 , we used CCR5 knock-in mice expressing human CCR5 (h-CCR5ki) for pharmacological studies and immunohistochemical analyses of CCR5-expressing cells. After 18 days of hypoxia, the h-CCR5ki mice had similar PH severity to that in WT mice and showed large increases in lung CCR5 protein levels (Figure 4A) and CCR5 staining in the PA-SMC layer of remodeled vessels (Figure 4B), whereas CCR5 staining in PA-ECs and macrophages was less affected by PH development (Figure 4C and D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we used several approaches: we evaluated CCR5 expression and localization in lung tissue from patients with PH; CCR5 −/− mice exposed to chronic hypoxia; and the effect of maraviroc-induced CCR5 inhibition on PH induced in mice by exposure to chronic hypoxia or SU5416/hypoxia. For these studies, we used CCR5 knock-in mice expressing human CCR5, as maraviroc does not bind to murine CCR5 21-23 and we also conducted cell studies in bone marrow (BM)-chimeric mice generated from CCR5 −/− and wild-type (WT) mice, to investigate whether the CCL5-CCR5 pathway led to PH through direct effects on pulmonary vascular cells or through cross-talk between macrophages and pulmonary-artery smooth muscle cells (PA-SMCs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet because many new-generation microbicides being considered contain antiretrovirals that often exhibit exquisite specificity for HIV, multiple SIV/SHIV macaque models need to be developed for efficacy testing in vivo (20,27,28,38,46,50,52). Furthermore, within different NHP models there are differences in viral (i.e., HIV versus SHIV envelope variable region 3) and host (i.e., human versus macaque CCR5) sequences, resulting in distinctions that preclude the use of certain HIV-specific inhibitors and can confound the interpretation of the data obtained (4,33,42,49). These factors together with the expense of NHP testing and the limited availability of female animals have severely limited their broad utilization in the evaluation of novel HIV prevention interventions.…”
Section: Vol 85 2011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[131] Another illustration involves TAK-779, which has a 100-fold higher affinity for human CCR5 than for mouse CCR5, complicating interpretation of the results from murine studies. [73,132] A careful inspection of all available results on CXCR3 points towards some species differences, caused by differences in the protein sequence of CXCR3 from various species. Compound 27 has affinities of 16 and 227 nm for human and murine CXCR3 ([ 35 S]-GTPgS), [102] respectively, whereas some compounds of the related later-stage tropanyl class reveal a 3-4-fold preference for human CXCR3.…”
Section: Modulation Of Cxcr3 By Nonpeptidergic a C H T U N G T R E N mentioning
confidence: 99%