Species richness and β-diversity patterns of macrolichens along elevation gradients across the Himalayan Arc

Abstract

Understanding the species richness and β-diversity patterns along elevation gradients can aid in formulating effective conservation strategies particularly in areas where local anthropogenic stresses and climate change are quite significant as in the Himalaya. Thus, we studied macrolichen richness and β-diversity along elevational gradients at three sites, namely Kashmir (2200 to 3800 m a.m.s.l), Uttarakhand (2000–3700 m a.m.s.l) and Sikkim (1700 to 4000 m a.m.s.l) which cover much of the Indian Himalayan Arc. In all, 245 macrolichen species belonging to 77 genera and 26 families were collected from the three sites. Only 11 species, 20 genera and 11 families were common among the three transects. Despite the differences in species composition, the dominant functional groups in the three sites were the same: foliose, fruticose and corticolous forms. The hump-shaped elevation pattern in species richness was exhibited by most of the lichen groups, though an inverse hump-shaped pattern was also observed in certain cases. β-diversity (βsor) based on all pairs of comparisons along an elevation gradient varied from 0.48 to 0.58 in Kashmir, 0.03 to 0.63 in Uttarakhand and 0.46 to 0.77 in Sikkim. The contribution of turnover to β-diversity was more than nestedness at all the three transects. Along elevation β-diversity and its components of turnover and nestedness varied significantly with elevation. While species turnover increased significantly along the elevation in all the three transects, nestedness decreased significantly in Kashmir and Sikkim transects but increased significantly in the Uttarakhand transect. Except for the Kashmir Himalayan elevation transect, stepwise β-diversity and its components of turnover and nestedness did not vary significantly with elevation. The present study, the first of its kind in the Himalayan region, clearly brings out that macrolichen species richness, β-diversity, and its components of turnover and nestedness vary along the elevation gradients across the Himalayan Arc. It also highlights that contribution of turnover to β-diversity is higher in comparison to nestedness at all the three transects. The variations in species richness and diversity along elevation gradients underpin the importance of considering elevational gradients in planning conservation strategies.

Giants of the Amazon: How does environmental variation drive the diversity patterns of large trees?

“…in floodplain areas at the Biome scale (Duivenvoorden, 1995;Moraes et al, 2021;Silman et al, 2007;Ter Steege et al, 2013;Wittmann et al, 2006). These diversity patterns are also observed in the context of source-sink effects along topographic gradients (Colville et al, 2020;Maharjan et al, 2021;Nanda et al, 2021;Syfert et al, 2018;Zelený et al, 2010) and along latitudinal gradients (Kraft et al, 2011;Roy et al, 2007;Slik et al, 2009). This would mean that on evolutionary timescales, these ecological mechanisms of lowland forests are essential for maintaining tree diversity in tropical mountain forest (Coelho de Souza et al, 2019;Slik et al, 2009).…”

The combined effects of habitat fragmentation and life history traits on specialisation in lichen symbioses

“…Previous studies dealing with lichen diversity along gradients of habitat loss in different forest ecosystems have reported a gradual loss of diversity as the available habitat diminished (Svoboda et al., 2010), with changes in abiotic conditions associated with an increasing fragment edge effect proposed as the main reason for such reduction (Asplund et al., 2014; Belinchón et al., 2007; Boudreault et al., 2008; Esseen & Renhorn, 1998). Hump‐shaped diversity patterns have been reported for lichen‐forming fungi along stand age (Asplund et al., 2014; Miller et al., 2020) and elevational gradients (Nanda et al., 2021). Brunialti et al.…”

Spatial mismatch between wild bee diversity hotspots and protected areas

“…Nonetheless, high‐elevation communities tend to be ecologically unique because they are composed of species that display specific adaptations to survive at high elevations and consequently contribute disproportionately to large‐scale taxonomic and functional β diversity (e.g., invertebrates [Fontana et al., 2020], lichens [Nanda et al., 2021]). In the case of wild bee communities in temperate latitudes, high‐elevation areas contain multiple wild bee species, including several high‐elevation specialist bumblebee species, which have been studied in Switzerland (Pellissier et al., 2013).…”