2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-013-9624-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species richness and guild composition in rubber plantations compared to secondary forest on Hainan Island, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found eight studies assessing impacts on smaller taxa in Southeast Asia. Synthesizing across these, we find that conversion of primary or secondary forest to rubber monoculture decreases the species richness of birds, bats and carabid beetles by 19-76% (Figure 3c, 1-7; Danielsen & Heegaard 1995;Aratrakorn et al 2006;Peh et al 2006;Meng et al 2011;Phommexay et al 2011;Li et al 2013). Conversion also changes species composition, with forest specialists replaced by disturbance-tolerant, widespread species (Nájera & Simonetti 2010).…”
Section: Biodiversity and Rubber Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We found eight studies assessing impacts on smaller taxa in Southeast Asia. Synthesizing across these, we find that conversion of primary or secondary forest to rubber monoculture decreases the species richness of birds, bats and carabid beetles by 19-76% (Figure 3c, 1-7; Danielsen & Heegaard 1995;Aratrakorn et al 2006;Peh et al 2006;Meng et al 2011;Phommexay et al 2011;Li et al 2013). Conversion also changes species composition, with forest specialists replaced by disturbance-tolerant, widespread species (Nájera & Simonetti 2010).…”
Section: Biodiversity and Rubber Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…; Li et al . ). Conversion also changes species composition, with forest specialists replaced by disturbance‐tolerant, widespread species (Nájera & Simonetti ).…”
Section: Biodiversity and Rubber Cultivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations