Areas of endemism or biotic elements comprise regions delimited by more than one taxon with coincident patterns of distribution. There is not an accepted universal protocol for delimitation of areas of endemism, and therefore, they are identified by several different methods. In this study, we propose an integrative comparison of different methods for identification of areas of endemism based on data of hypothetical and real distributions.Therefore, the general aims of this study are: (1) to compare the Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity (PAE), the Endemicity Analysis (EA) and a new coding method that we propose, the Three-Item Analysis of Distributions (3ID) to contrast their performance based on their ability to identify hypothetical predefined areas of endemism representing nonconflicting, nested and overlapping patterns; (2) to analyze the patterns of distribution of benthic, pelagic and benthopelagic non-siphonophore hydrozoans of the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean (SWAO), to test previous biogeographic hypotheses of regionalization for the area and to evaluate the performance of the endemicity methods based on real datasets.In chapter 2, entitled "Comparison of analysis of endemism procedures based on hypothetical distributions", we compared the performance of PAE, EA and 3ID, and we found that 3ID has the greatest percentage of success in retrieving predefined areas of endemism. EA is the only method that recovers overlapping patterns, but it can also find spurious patterns. We recommend the use of 3ID together with EA as the best available