2008
DOI: 10.1890/07-1104.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPECIES RESPONSES TO NITROGEN FERTILIZATION IN HERBACEOUS PLANT COMMUNITIES, AND ASSOCIATED SPECIES TRAITSEcological ArchivesE089-070

Abstract: This synthetic data set contains plant species relative abundance measures from 35 nitrogen (N) fertilization experiments conducted at 10 sites across North America. The data set encompasses the fertilization responses of 575 taxa from 1159 experimental plots. The methodology varied among experiments, in particular with regard to the type and amount of N added, plot size, species composition measure (biomass harvest, pin count, or percent cover), additional experimental manipulations, and experimental duration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At some sites, fertilization experiments were conducted in multiple community types or additional manipulations such as water addition or mowing were included as separate "experiments" in the study design, allowing us to evaluate the eVects of fertilization across a wide range of environmental parameter space. In all comparisons, we were examining how species abundances changed in response to N-addition and compare results to the appropriate "control" treatment to which no N was added (details in ESM 1 and Cleland et al 2008). Although species richness and composition diVer across sites, species of all six growth forms occurred in almost all sites and experiments (ESM 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At some sites, fertilization experiments were conducted in multiple community types or additional manipulations such as water addition or mowing were included as separate "experiments" in the study design, allowing us to evaluate the eVects of fertilization across a wide range of environmental parameter space. In all comparisons, we were examining how species abundances changed in response to N-addition and compare results to the appropriate "control" treatment to which no N was added (details in ESM 1 and Cleland et al 2008). Although species richness and composition diVer across sites, species of all six growth forms occurred in almost all sites and experiments (ESM 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the combined eVects of clonal growth form and height on species response to fertilization, we created six height-clonal growth form categories based on the morphology of species growing in plots that did not receive added N in each experiment (data published in Cleland et al 2008). Each species was classiWed into one of three clonal growth forms that reXected diVerences in lateral spread (non-clonal, runner, or clumper) and one of two height categories [tall (the top third of the canopy relative to the maximum in that community) or short (the bottom two-thirds of the canopy)].…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compiled data from four experimental studies of water addition in grassland or mixed shrubland ⁄ grassland systems that ranged widely in their baseline precipitation (drawn from the dataset assembled by Cleland et al, 2008). These studies were conducted at Konza Tallgrass Prairie, a Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) site in Kansas (Knapp et al, 2001), the Shortgrass Steppe LTER in northern Colorado, the Sevilleta LTER in New Mexico (S Baez et al, unpublished) and Jasper Ridge in California (Zavaleta et al, 2003).…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traits included carbon assimilation and nitrogen per unit mass (A mass , N mass ) and area (A area , N area ), as well as specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf life span (LL). Finally, we used plant height data from Cleland et al (2008), which were available only for species at the experimental sites. Here, height was a categorical variable, where species were described as typically reaching the lower, middle or upper third of the vegetation canopy.…”
Section: Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed trait groups using a published trait database that included species from KPBS (Cleland et al 2008). The traits included life history strategy (annual, biennial, or perennial), detailed life form (C 3 grass, C 4 grass, leguminous forb, non-leguminous forb, evergreen shrub, or deciduous shrub), height within the canopy, clonality, and nativity.…”
Section: Trait Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%