2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species of Metarhizium anisopliae complex implicated in human infections: retrospective sequencing study

Abstract: In this study, we report new human cases of Metarhizium infections, and, based on Ef-1α gene sequencing, we demonstrate the misidentification of species in case reports. We also correct the species identification of a strain reported as M. anisopliae used in a commercially available mycopesticide. According to our results, none of the strains from the human infection reports reviewed belongs to the species M. anisopliae.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been few reports of ocular infections secondary to the M. anisopliae complex, 2,6 and only 3 reports of Metarhizium keratitis specifically identify M. robertsii as the causative agent. 7 All of the reported cases of M. anisopliae complex ocular infection were in immunocompetent individuals, as in our patient. The reported mechanisms of fungal infection included contact lens wear and/or exposure to soil during agricultural work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…There have been few reports of ocular infections secondary to the M. anisopliae complex, 2,6 and only 3 reports of Metarhizium keratitis specifically identify M. robertsii as the causative agent. 7 All of the reported cases of M. anisopliae complex ocular infection were in immunocompetent individuals, as in our patient. The reported mechanisms of fungal infection included contact lens wear and/or exposure to soil during agricultural work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…While most of the species discovered in Metarhizium are considered entomopathogenic, studies of their plant-growth promoting and endophytic, rhizosphere or soil-dwelling properties have been increasing ( Hu and St Leger, 2002 , Chad et al., 2014 , Iwanicki et al., 2019 ). As they continue to promote plant health by increasing nutrient absorption through the roots and killing insect pests ( Sasan and Bidochka, 2012 , Liao et al., 2014 , Liao et al., 2017 ) and being used for biological control, reports have also showed Metarhizium implicated in human infections ( Nourrisson et al. 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is notably the case for the hyphomycetes Metarhizium spp. (Nourrisson et al, 2017) and the entomophthorale Conidiobolus coronatus (Chappity and Hallur, 2021;Vilela and Mendoza, 2018). Such cases remain rare and usually only affect vulnerable, e.g.…”
Section: Substitution-based Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%