Abstract:Plants link above- and belowground subsystems, and our results suggest that their phylogenetic relationships leave a “fingerprint” on belowground communities. We found that after correcting for evolutionary history, tree species identity influenced belowground arthropod communities through plant functional traits. These data suggest that plant species structure may be an important predictor in shaping associated soil arthropod communities and further suggest the importance of better understanding the extended … Show more
“…; Bardgett & Wardle ; Gorman et al . ). At finer scales, species modify local soil conditions in the vicinity of their highly variable root environments through the exudation of hormones, sugars, phenolics and amino acids (Bardgett & van der Putten ).…”
Section: Mechanisms That Link Ecosystems and Evolution Via Psfmentioning
Summary
1.While an appreciation of plant-soil feedbacks (PSF) continues to expand for community and ecosystem ecology, the eco-evolutionary mechanisms and consequences of such feedbacks remain largely unknown or untested. 2. Determining the cause and effect of plant phenotypes is central for understanding these ecoevolutionary dynamics since phenotypes respond to soil selective gradients that are, in turn, modified by plant traits. Genetic variation in plant phenotypes can change soil processes and biotic communities; oppositely, soil gradients and microbial communities can influence the expression and evolution of plant phenotypes. 3. Although these processes represent the two halves of genetic based PSF, research in these areas has developed independently from one another. Greater connectivity between research on ecosystem consequences of plant genetic variation and soil selective gradients that drive plant phenotypic evolution will create novel and important opportunities to link ecology and evolution in natural systems. 4. Papers in this special feature build on the inherent ecological and evolutionary processes involved in PSF, outlining many ways to identify and test mechanisms that connect ecosystem ecology and evolution.
“…; Bardgett & Wardle ; Gorman et al . ). At finer scales, species modify local soil conditions in the vicinity of their highly variable root environments through the exudation of hormones, sugars, phenolics and amino acids (Bardgett & van der Putten ).…”
Section: Mechanisms That Link Ecosystems and Evolution Via Psfmentioning
Summary
1.While an appreciation of plant-soil feedbacks (PSF) continues to expand for community and ecosystem ecology, the eco-evolutionary mechanisms and consequences of such feedbacks remain largely unknown or untested. 2. Determining the cause and effect of plant phenotypes is central for understanding these ecoevolutionary dynamics since phenotypes respond to soil selective gradients that are, in turn, modified by plant traits. Genetic variation in plant phenotypes can change soil processes and biotic communities; oppositely, soil gradients and microbial communities can influence the expression and evolution of plant phenotypes. 3. Although these processes represent the two halves of genetic based PSF, research in these areas has developed independently from one another. Greater connectivity between research on ecosystem consequences of plant genetic variation and soil selective gradients that drive plant phenotypic evolution will create novel and important opportunities to link ecology and evolution in natural systems. 4. Papers in this special feature build on the inherent ecological and evolutionary processes involved in PSF, outlining many ways to identify and test mechanisms that connect ecosystem ecology and evolution.
“…Most of this research combining plants and soil fauna either used plant traits to explain faunal taxonomic composition or used vegetation structure and composition to explain the changes in faunal traits (Gorman et al . ; Podgaiski et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moretti & Legg 2009;Frenette-Dussault, Shipley & Hingrat 2013;Fournier et al 2015). Some have, nonetheless, demonstrated a strong impact of plant functional composition on soil fauna or surface-dwelling arthropods (Frenette-Dussault, Shipley & Hingrat 2013;Gorman et al 2013;Pakeman & Stockan 2014). Most of this research combining plants and soil fauna either used plant traits to explain faunal taxonomic composition or used vegetation structure and composition to explain the changes in faunal traits (Gorman et al 2013;Podgaiski et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have, nonetheless, demonstrated a strong impact of plant functional composition on soil fauna or surface-dwelling arthropods (Frenette-Dussault, Shipley & Hingrat 2013;Gorman et al 2013;Pakeman & Stockan 2014). Most of this research combining plants and soil fauna either used plant traits to explain faunal taxonomic composition or used vegetation structure and composition to explain the changes in faunal traits (Gorman et al 2013;Podgaiski et al 2013). However, none of them combined both analyses, which is what we intend to do in this study by focusing on both above-and below-ground traits.…”
Summary
1.Trait-based approaches have the potential to reveal general and predictive relationships between organisms and ecosystem functioning. However, the mechanisms underlying the functional structure of communities are still unclear. Within terrestrial ecosystems, several studies have shown that many ecological processes are controlled by the interacting above-and belowground compartments. However, few studies have used traits to reveal the functional relationships between plants and soil fauna. Mostly, research combining plants and soil fauna solely used the traits of one assemblage in predictive studies. 2. Above-ground (plants) and below-ground (Collembola) compartments were sampled over a flooding gradient in northern France along the Seine River. First, we measured the effect of flooding on functional and taxonomic assembly within both communities. We then considered the linkages between plant and Collembolan species richness, community traits and assessed whether traits of both compartments converged at high flooding intensity (abiotic filtering) and diverged when this constraint is released (biotic filtering). 3. Species richness of both taxa followed the same bell-shaped pattern along the gradient, while a similar significant pattern of functional richness was only observed for plants. Further analyses revealed a progressive shift from trait convergence to divergence for plants, but not for Collembola, as constraints intensity decreased. Instead, our results highlighted that Collembola traits were mainly linked to the variations in plant traits. This leads, within Collembola assemblages, to convergence of a subset of perception and habitat-related traits for which the relationship with plant traits was assessed. 4. Synthesis. Using a trait-based approach, our study highlighted that functional relationships occur between above-and below-ground compartments. We underlined that functional composition of plant communities plays a key role in structuring Collembola assemblages in addition to the role of abiotic variables. Our study clearly shows that functional diversity provides a new approach to link the above-and below-ground compartments and might, therefore, be further considered when studying ecological processes at the interface between both compartments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.