Abstract:Knowledge on the structure and composition of the plant communities has enormous significance in conservation and management of forests. The present study aimed to assess the community attributes, viz., structure, composition and diversity in the moist and dry sal (Shorea robusta) forests in the West Bengal province of India and compare them with the other sal forests of India. The phytosociological data from these forests were quantitatively analysed to work out the species richness, diversity, evenness, domi… Show more
“…A study from foothills of Darjeeling Himalaya showed that the diversity of tree species is much higher in sal forests than previously hypothesized (Shankar 2001). Subsequent studies from the same region confirmed the trend (Kushwaha and Nandy 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, a case of high tree diversity in a sal forest was reported from Mahananda wildlife sanctuary in foothills of eastern Himalaya in the beginning of this century (Shankar 2001). Further investigation spanning larger geographical area of eastern Himalayan terai (including Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri and Coochbehar) endorsed that sal forests of this region harbour high levels of woody species diversity (Kushwaha and Nandy 2012). Floristic inventories in sal forests vary dramatically in plot size, sampled area, and measurement threshold of minimum stem diameter, imposing a restriction in comparison of species richness (Table 5).…”
Section: Floristics and Species Richnessmentioning
Background: The 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem in Meghalaya, India represents the easternmost limit of sal distribution. We tested if tree diversity and compositional heterogeneity of this ecosystem was higher than other sal-dominated forests due to moister environment. Methods: Vegetation was sampled in 11 transects of 10 m width and up to 500 m length covering 5.2 ha area. All stems ≥ 10 cm girth at breast height were enumerated. Results: We found a pattern of mixed dominance of Shorea robusta (sal) and Schima wallichii and co-dominance of Pinus kesiya and Careya arborea. The Shannon's diversity index (H′) was 3.395 nats. This value is remarkably high and competitive to that of moist sal forests of eastern Himalayan foothills and sal-dominated forests of Tripura. A high value of H′ was manifested by: a) high species richness (S = 123), b) good equitability (70.6%), c) 'fair' resource apportionment, and d) abundance of rare species (84% species with less than one per cent of total individuals, 67% species with two or less individuals ha −1 and 59% species with one or less individuals ha −1 ). The compositional heterogeneity was 'fair' (Whittaker's β w = 3.15). The presence of Fagaceae with six species commanding 4.3% of importance value (IVI) and of a pine (P. kesiya) in sal forest was remarkable. As many as 58 species showed 'low density (≤ 10 individuals ha −1 ), uniform dispersion', five species achieved 'higher density (> 10 individuals ha
“…A study from foothills of Darjeeling Himalaya showed that the diversity of tree species is much higher in sal forests than previously hypothesized (Shankar 2001). Subsequent studies from the same region confirmed the trend (Kushwaha and Nandy 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, a case of high tree diversity in a sal forest was reported from Mahananda wildlife sanctuary in foothills of eastern Himalaya in the beginning of this century (Shankar 2001). Further investigation spanning larger geographical area of eastern Himalayan terai (including Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri and Coochbehar) endorsed that sal forests of this region harbour high levels of woody species diversity (Kushwaha and Nandy 2012). Floristic inventories in sal forests vary dramatically in plot size, sampled area, and measurement threshold of minimum stem diameter, imposing a restriction in comparison of species richness (Table 5).…”
Section: Floristics and Species Richnessmentioning
Background: The 'Khasi hill sal' forest ecosystem in Meghalaya, India represents the easternmost limit of sal distribution. We tested if tree diversity and compositional heterogeneity of this ecosystem was higher than other sal-dominated forests due to moister environment. Methods: Vegetation was sampled in 11 transects of 10 m width and up to 500 m length covering 5.2 ha area. All stems ≥ 10 cm girth at breast height were enumerated. Results: We found a pattern of mixed dominance of Shorea robusta (sal) and Schima wallichii and co-dominance of Pinus kesiya and Careya arborea. The Shannon's diversity index (H′) was 3.395 nats. This value is remarkably high and competitive to that of moist sal forests of eastern Himalayan foothills and sal-dominated forests of Tripura. A high value of H′ was manifested by: a) high species richness (S = 123), b) good equitability (70.6%), c) 'fair' resource apportionment, and d) abundance of rare species (84% species with less than one per cent of total individuals, 67% species with two or less individuals ha −1 and 59% species with one or less individuals ha −1 ). The compositional heterogeneity was 'fair' (Whittaker's β w = 3.15). The presence of Fagaceae with six species commanding 4.3% of importance value (IVI) and of a pine (P. kesiya) in sal forest was remarkable. As many as 58 species showed 'low density (≤ 10 individuals ha −1 ), uniform dispersion', five species achieved 'higher density (> 10 individuals ha
“…Previous studies have reported 215 species of trees from seven forest types of Darjeeling foothills , 134 species of trees in the dry and moist sal forests of northern West Bengal (Kushwaha & Nandy 2012), 87 species of trees in Mahananda Wildlife Sanctuary (Shankar 2001), 74 species of trees in tropical parts of Darjeeling hills (Moktan & Das 2014). In addition to studies solely focusing on estimation of tree species richness many Figure 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forests of Central and Eastern Himalaya are also rich in plant species diversity and endemism (Singh & Singh 1987;Shankar 2001;Behera et al 2002;Das & Ghosh 2011;Kandel et al 2016), at the same time these forests are under heavy anthropogenic disturbances posing a threat on the existence of many rare species in the forest communities (Pandit et al 2007;Bhuyan et al 2003;Kushwaha & Nandy 2012). Eastern Himalayan forests are highly diverse as compared to northwest Himalaya with approximately fivefold higher number of species (Purohit & Dhar 1997).…”
Assessment of tree species diversity in species rich tropical forests, especially in Eastern Himalaya, requires careful planning and adequate sampling. We assessed alpha diversity of tree species in Chapramari Wildlife Sanctuary, located at the foot-hills of Eastern Himalaya employing two scales of sampling i.e., multiple small quadrats of 0.1 ha in more open forest and a large grid of 5 ha in comparatively dense forest. Species rarefaction curves show accumulation of species up to 10 ha sampling area indicating that large sample size is required to estimate alpha diversity.Comparison of species richness, diversity, density and basal area indicate that open forest show higher species richness and diversity but density and basal area is higher in dense forest. Species abundance distribution demonstrates few dominants in the forest community with best fit models in log-series distribution denoting many rare species. Thus studies in species rich forest communities need consideration of sufficient sampling area for evaluation of alpha diversity. Rarity of species, especially in the present times of climate change needs to be properly evaluated in ecological studies to assess the conservation status of Himalayan forest communities.
“…Kale and Roy (2012), however, observed a good correlation between NPP and plant diversity in another Indian tropical dry deciduous forest site. In yet another study, Kushwaha and Nandy (2012) found a significant decrease in plant species diversity from moist to dry forests differing in rainfall, disturbance, and management practices.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.