Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3460112.3471966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species Distribution Modeling for Machine Learning Practitioners: A Review

Abstract: Figure 1. Species distribution models describe the relationship between environmental conditions and (actual or potential) species presence. However, the link between the environment and species distribution data can be complex, particularly since distributional data comes in many different forms. Above are four different sources of distribution data for the Von Der Decken's Hornbill [11]: (from left to right) raw point observations, regional checklists, gridded ecological surveys, and data-driven expert range… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these methods are still closer to the statistical end of the spectrum (i.e., the data lead the dance), using mechanistically derived layers that translate time series of environmental conditions into metrics of fitness relevant to the species should help these models predict more reliably to novel conditions. Alternatively, Bayesian statistics and “domain‐aware” or “model‐informed” machine learning models can be used to inform statistical models with biological information and constraints, which can come from biophysical models or experimental results (Beery et al, 2021; Kotta et al, 2019). Additionally, inverse modeling could be used to infer biophysical model parameters from endpoints such as occurrences (Evans et al, 2016; Fordham et al, 2022).…”
Section: Vision For Future Of Tackling Global Change Biology Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these methods are still closer to the statistical end of the spectrum (i.e., the data lead the dance), using mechanistically derived layers that translate time series of environmental conditions into metrics of fitness relevant to the species should help these models predict more reliably to novel conditions. Alternatively, Bayesian statistics and “domain‐aware” or “model‐informed” machine learning models can be used to inform statistical models with biological information and constraints, which can come from biophysical models or experimental results (Beery et al, 2021; Kotta et al, 2019). Additionally, inverse modeling could be used to infer biophysical model parameters from endpoints such as occurrences (Evans et al, 2016; Fordham et al, 2022).…”
Section: Vision For Future Of Tackling Global Change Biology Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of species distribution models and machine learning methods is an emerging field in ecology [e.g. (Effrosynidis et al, 2020;Beery et al, 2021)]. In our study, the combination of SDM and a random forest ensemble learning algorithm enabled us to derive information on abundance from a multi-source heterogeneous data set of mainly opportunistic sighting records and to present an additional set of abundance estimates for some of the most frequently visited research areas in the Southern Ocean.…”
Section: Methods Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While species distribution modeling has traditionally focused on local or regional scales, analyses at increasingly large scales are gaining popularity. Machine learning methods are becoming the leading tools for such analyses [25][26][27][28] .…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human population density is one of several measures of human presence and activity which together define the human "footprint," associated with profound, adverse effects on natural systems 78 . Given this pervasive impact, data characterizing degree of human influence are used as predictors in some ecological models, including SDMs 28 . The Gridded Population of the World (GPW) 68 density dataset represents the global distribution of human population density, developed using census records, population registers, and the administrative boundaries of approximately 13.5 million national and subnational units.…”
Section: Human Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%