1947
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1947.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species crosses in Antirrhinum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1949
1949
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analysis of different species within the European section of the genus Antirrhinum was undertaken using sequences from the third intron of Nia and from intron 5 to the stop codon of the Dfr gene. The occurrence of inter-specific hybrids generating morphologically intermediate specimens, reported in the wild where overlapping populations occur (Mather, 1947), has been a major obstacle in obtaining a clear picture of the phylogenetic relationships among the species within the genus Antirrhinum. Studies using chloroplastic (Gubitz et al, 2003) or nuclear (Vargas et al, 2004) DNA markers have provided little resolution as a result of insufficient numbers of informative characters, although the combination of plastid and nuclear markers has proved more informative (Vargas et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analysis of different species within the European section of the genus Antirrhinum was undertaken using sequences from the third intron of Nia and from intron 5 to the stop codon of the Dfr gene. The occurrence of inter-specific hybrids generating morphologically intermediate specimens, reported in the wild where overlapping populations occur (Mather, 1947), has been a major obstacle in obtaining a clear picture of the phylogenetic relationships among the species within the genus Antirrhinum. Studies using chloroplastic (Gubitz et al, 2003) or nuclear (Vargas et al, 2004) DNA markers have provided little resolution as a result of insufficient numbers of informative characters, although the combination of plastid and nuclear markers has proved more informative (Vargas et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%