Species composition and ecological characteristics of rove beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the southern taiga of the Middle Urals

Belskaya, Elena; Колесникова, А. А.

doi:10.1134/s0013873811050058

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Russia: ALTAI REP (Psarev 2015); BURYAT REP (Dorzhieva 2015; cSha); CN EUR RU (Kozodoi 1982; Gruntal 2009; Semenov 2009; Pirugin 2010; Troshkova and Troshkov 2014; Semionenkov et al 2015; cKur; FMNH; NHMD; ZIN; NHMD; ZMMU); CRIM REP. (Nordmann 1837; Gusarov 1989; ZIN); CS EUR RU (Boháč 1988; Semenov 2015; Ruchin 2015; cRyv); E CAUC (Khachikov 1998; cRyv); EUR S–TAIGA (Dedyukhin et al 2005); IRKUTSK PROV (Shavrin et al 1999; 2001; Shavrin 2000, 2001; cSha; cSme); KALIN PROV (Alekseev 2014); KAREL REP (cRyv); KRSNYRSK (Sahlberg 1880; Rybalov et al 2000; cRyv; ZIN); KUZN ALTAI (Babenko 1991; Sushchev et al 2015; cRyv); MDL OB (Babenko 2016; Babenko and Nuzhnykh 2014); MDL URAL (Sahlberg 1880; Heyden 1880; Smetana 1978b; Uhova 2001; Ermakov 2003; Belskaya and Kolesnikova 2011; cRyv); MDL VOLGA (Krasnobaev 1992; Matveev 2011; Goreslavets et al 2002; Shulaev and Bogdanov 2008; Semenov and Egorov 2009a; Goreslavets 2010, 2014, 2016a, b; Semenov et al 2013, 2015a; cRyv; ZIN); N CAUC (Bolov 1969a, b; Khachikov 1998; Solodovnikov 1998; Iljina and Khachikov 2000; Pushkin and Maksimova 2014; Aiydov 2015; Pushkin and Minav 2015; Pushkin 2015, 2016; cRyv; CSha; ZIN); NE EUR RU (Konakova and Kolesnikova 2011a; 2014; 2017); N YENISS (Smetana 1978b; Rybalov et al 2000; cRyv); NW EUR RU (Poppius 1908; Kolesnikova and Taskaev...…”

Section: Annotated Catalogue Of Species Of Quedius Of Russiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Russia: BURYAT (Shavrin 1998); CN EUR RU (Semenov 2009; Pirugin 2009; Troshkova and Troshkov 2014; Semionenkov et al 2015; Ruchin 2017; ZIN); EUR S–TAIGA RU (Dedyukhin 2005); IRKUTSK PROV (Shavrin et al 2001); KAREL REP (cRyv); KRSNYRSK (Veselova and Ryvkin 1991; cRyv); KUZN ALTAI (Babenko 1991); MDL OB (Smetana 1978b; ZIN); MDL URAL (Uhova 2001; Belskaya and Kolesnikova 2011); MDL VOLGA (Goreslavets et al 2002; Shulaev and Bogdanov 2008; Semenov et al 2013; Goreslavets 2016; cRyv; ZIN); MURM PROV (cRyv; ZIN); NE EUR RU (Shilov 1975; Kolesnikova and Taskaeva 2003; Kolesnikova and Konakova 2010; Konakova and Kolesnikova 2011a, 2014, 2017; ZIN); NEN–NVZEM (Konakova and Kolesnikova 2014); N YENISS (cRyv; ZIN); NW EUR RU (Seidlitz 1875; Poppius 1908; Kolesnikova 2008; ZIN); S URAL (Voitenkova 2016; LUOMUS); SW SIBER (Buhkalo et al 2012); ZABAIK TERR (Shavrin 2000); unspecified localities: northern part of European Russia (Silfverberg 1992).…”

Section: Annotated Catalogue Of Species Of Quedius Of Russiamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rove beetles of the genus Quedius (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of Russia: a key to species and annotated catalogue

Salnitska

Solodovnikov

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is the first inventory of the fauna of the rove beetle genusQuediusin the Russian Federation. It provides an annotated catalogue of 88 species ofQuediuscurrently recorded from Russia, based on several collections and a critical evaluation of all earlier published records. All species are listed with a summary of their overall distribution and bionomics. Species distributions within Russia are given as lists of regions where they occur with references to the respective source collections or publications which any record is based on. For that, the territory of Russia is divided into 40 regions that mostly follow the administrative division of the country. The annotated catalogue is supplemented by a well-illustrated identification key to all species and a concise checklist in form of an easily visualized table.QuediusfususCai & Zhou, 2015,QuediushumosusSolodovnikov, 2005, andQuediuslundbergiPalm, 1973 are recorded from the territory of Russia for the first time. Based on an analysis of literature and available material, records ofQuediuscincticollisKraatz, 1857,QuediushumeralisStephens, 1832,Quediusmaurorufus(Gravenhorst 1806),QuediusnemoralisBaudi de Selve, 1848,QuediusnigrocaeruleusFauvel, 1876, andQuediuspicipes(Mannerheim, 1830) from Russia are considered doubtful. The distribution ofQuediusbrachypterusCoiffait, 1967, described from the ‘Caucasus’, remains ambiguous and its presence in Russia is unlikely. The identity ofQuediusfulvipennisHochhuth, 1851 from ‘Dahuria’ remains unknown, pending examination of the type material. ForQuediuscitelliKirschenblatt, 1933 a lectotype is designated. For that species andQ.sofiriKhachikov, 2015 illustrations of the aedeagi are provided for the first time. The paper stresses the currently poor state of knowledge of theQuediusdiversity in Russia and provides a platform for its improvement, which should begin with a large-scale sampling program, especially in Siberia and Far East.

show abstract

Section: Annotated Catalogue Of Species Of Quedius Of Russiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Annotated Catalogue Of Species Of Quedius Of Russiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Rove beetles of the genus Quedius (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of Russia: a key to species and annotated catalogue

Salnitska

Solodovnikov

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The each specimen was identified through suitable identification keys, morphological characters and taxonomy books (Hill 1993, Gillote 2005, David & Ananthakrisnan 2006, Richards & Davies 2013, Thapa 2015. The reference keys for identification were used from the published articles (Stubbs & Falk 1983, Belskaya & Kolesnikova 2011. The species were also morphologically compared with the identified specimen of Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu and some species were compared with the voucher specimens of Entomological Division of Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC) Khumaltar, Nepal.…”

Section: Identification and Preservationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assemblage of Insects on Medicinal Plants: An Insight from ICIMOD Herbal Garden in Godavari of Lalitpur, Nepal

Bhusal

Shrestha

Ghimire

2019

J. Inst. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Present study was conducted within the herbal garden of International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) in Godawari of Kathmandu valley to explore the insect communities in medicinal plants. Five medicinal plants, viz. Rauvolfia serpentina (= Sarpagandha), Urtica dioca (= Sissnu), Zanthoxylum armatum (= Timur), Valeriana jatamansii (= Sungandhawal) and Mentha spicata (= Pudina) were selected for the study. Insects were randomly sampled during four seasons from September 2017 to June 2018 using different collecting techniques, like hand picking, pit-fall traps, net-sweeping and stem beating. A total of 869 insects individuals belonging to 42 different genera were collected and identified. It was found that the abundance of insects was high during spring season (299 insects comprising 35 % of collected species), followed by summer (255 insects comprising 29 % of collected species) and winter (219 insects comprising 25 % of collected species) seasons, and low during autumn season (96 insects comprising 11 % of collected species). It was further found that the abundance of insect species was temperature-dependent, but was independent of relative humidity. The maximum indicator species were present on M. spicata. Taxonomic distinctness (delta+) of insects was high on V. jatamansii, but low on U. dioca.

show abstract

“…The habitat group consisted of: forest specialists (inhabiting only forests), habitat generalists (which inhabiting various habitats) and open area specialists (inhabiting open areas). Our classifications were based on the works of Thiele (1977), Nunberg (1985), Eisenbeis and Wichard (1987), Boháč et al (2007), Tarnawski and Buchholz (2008) and Belskaya and Kolesnikova (2011).…”

Section: Beetle Life Traits For Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the feeding strategy, the life traits of these twelve species are more diverse: zoophagous (5 species), dendrophagous (3 species), herbiphagous (1 species) and mixophagous (3 species). Predator species B. puncticollis, C. majus, Q.limbatus, G. appendiculatus and P. cognatus prey on litter microarthropods, especially Collembola (Shomann et al 2008), armored mites and small larvae of Diptera (Belskaya and Kolesnikova 2011), the abundance of which is strongly affected by nitrogen deposition (Xu et al 2009). The presence of the above-mentioned five species in groups of beetles associated with forests at a distanced 10 and 20 km from nitrogen fertilizer plant suggests its good microhabitats and food supply there.…”

Section: Speciesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coleoptera assemblages of pine forests depends on the distance to the source of nitrogen pollution

Tamutis¹,

Skłodowski²

2016

Community Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper analyzed the changes of beetle assemblages in the litter layer of eutrophic pine forests in the zone polluted by a nitrogen fertilizer plant Joint Stock Company "Achema" (Lithuania). We hypothesized that abundance, diversity and life traits of beetle assemblages depend on the distance from the pollution source. The samples of the litter layer were taken from pine stands at the distances of 3, 5, 10 and 20 km from the plant. The PCA and GLM analyses were used to reduce the number of variables to the main environmental gradient and assess the influence of environmental factors on beetle abundance, number of species, and life traits. The dependence of species number, abundance and the presence of forest and dendrophagous species on the distance from the plant was detected. A significant impact of organic carbon content, nitrogen emission and moss cover on other life traits of beetles was disclosed. The abundance of moss fraction in the litter layer was positively correlated with increasing distance from the plant. The ability to tolerate polluted sites by three species: Atheta fungi, Micrambe abietis and Brassicogethes aeneus, and intolerance of pollution by eight species: Bryaxis puncticollis, Quedius limbatus, Cyphon pubescens, Cephenium majus, Cyphon padi, Cyphon variabilis, Gabrius appendiculatus and Philonthus cognatus, were detected by IndVal analysis. The distribution of litter species was affected by the distance from the plant and by the richness of moss cover.

show abstract

Species composition and ecological characteristics of rove beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the southern taiga of the Middle Urals

Cited by 8 publications

References 21 publications

Rove beetles of the genus Quedius (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of Russia: a key to species and annotated catalogue

Rove beetles of the genus Quedius (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of Russia: a key to species and annotated catalogue

Assemblage of Insects on Medicinal Plants: An Insight from ICIMOD Herbal Garden in Godavari of Lalitpur, Nepal

Coleoptera assemblages of pine forests depends on the distance to the source of nitrogen pollution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About