1996
DOI: 10.2307/2261477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species-Area and Species-Individual Relationships for Tropical Trees: A Comparison of Three 50-ha Plots

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. A total of 610000 stems were identified to species and mapped to < 1 m accuracy. Mean species number and stem number were calculated in quadrats as small as 5 m x 5 m to as la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
319
4
43

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
18
319
4
43
Order By: Relevance
“…Four measures were used to characterize species diversity; each emphasizes a different aspect of diversity. These were as follows: species richness, S, the number of species per 900 m 2 ; Fisher's ␣, S ϭ ␣ ln(1 ϩ N͞␣), a formulation commonly used for highly diverse tropical forest data sets (22) (where S is the species richness, N is the number of individuals, ln means natural logarithm, and ␣ is the sole parameter); Shannon's index, HЈ ϭ Ϫ⌺p i log 2 p i , which accords greater weight to contrasts in rare species; and S max or estimated true species richness. We estimated S max (asymptotic number of species) and B (species overlap) from the set of values for S(n) generated from the species-area accumulation curves by fitting each curve to the two-parameter hyperbola,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four measures were used to characterize species diversity; each emphasizes a different aspect of diversity. These were as follows: species richness, S, the number of species per 900 m 2 ; Fisher's ␣, S ϭ ␣ ln(1 ϩ N͞␣), a formulation commonly used for highly diverse tropical forest data sets (22) (where S is the species richness, N is the number of individuals, ln means natural logarithm, and ␣ is the sole parameter); Shannon's index, HЈ ϭ Ϫ⌺p i log 2 p i , which accords greater weight to contrasts in rare species; and S max or estimated true species richness. We estimated S max (asymptotic number of species) and B (species overlap) from the set of values for S(n) generated from the species-area accumulation curves by fitting each curve to the two-parameter hyperbola,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on modern tropical analogues (Gentry 1982;Valencia et al 1994;Condit et al 1996Condit et al , 2002Condit et al , 2005Wright 2002;Hubbell et al 2008;Lamarre et al 2012), habitat quality is higher in terra firma lowland environments than in swamps (Prance 1979(Prance , 1989Terborgh et al 2002, fig. 1.2; Koponen et al 2004;Lopez and Kursar 2007).…”
Section: Pennsylvanian Lowland Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Após as identificações, foram feitas as análises de composição florística, por meio do número de famílias, gêneros, espécies e riqueza de espécies, tomando por base a curva espécie/área que, segundo Magurran (1988) e Condit et al (1996), é eficiente para avaliar a riqueza de uma comunidade florística. Parâmetros estruturais foram avaliados por meio do IVI (índice de Valor de Importância) e número de indivíduos por classe de DAP.…”
Section: B) Laboratóriounclassified