SPECIATION IN THE EMERALD TOUCANET (<i>AULACORHYNCHUS PRASINUS</i>) COMPLEX

Puebla-Olivares, Fernando; Bonaccorso, Elisa; Monteros, Alejandro Espinosa de los; Omland, Kevin E.; Llorente-Bousquets, Jeorge E.; Peterson, A. Townsend; Navarro‐Sigüenza, Adolfo G.

doi:10.1525/auk.2008.125.1.39

Cited by 63 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Aquila is polyphyletic; significant rearrangements at generic level; Accipiter left unresolved (146-163) Falconiformes no major taxonomic change; Falco left largely unresolved (147,152,158,164,165 (72,(273)(274)(275)(276)(277)(278)(279)(280)(281)(282)(283)(284)(285)(286)(287)(288)(289)(290)(291) …”

Section: Accipitriformesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Update of Wallace’s Zoogeographic Regions of the World

Holt

Lessard

Borregaard

et al. 2013

Science

1,086

1,182

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern attempts to produce biogeographic maps focus on the distribution of species, and the maps are typically drawn without phylogenetic considerations. Here, we generate a global map of zoogeographic regions by combining data on the distributions and phylogenetic relationships of 21,037 species of amphibians, birds, and mammals. We identify 20 distinct zoogeographic regions, which are grouped into 11 larger realms. We document the lack of support for several regions previously defined based on distributional data and show that spatial turnover in the phylogenetic composition of vertebrate assemblages is higher in the Southern than in the Northern Hemisphere. We further show that the integration of phylogenetic information provides valuable insight on historical relationships among regions, permitting the identification of evolutionarily unique regions of the world.

show abstract

Section: Accipitriformesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Update of Wallace’s Zoogeographic Regions of the World

Holt

Lessard

Borregaard

et al. 2013

Science

1,086

1,182

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our ongoing efforts to understand and summarize the Mexican avifauna (Escalante-Pliego et al 1993, Peterson andNavarro-Sigüenza 2000b), we have become aware of numerous species taxa that merit full recognition as species, under both the biological species concept and the evolutionary species concept (Navarro-Sigüenza et al 1992, Peterson and Navarro-Sigüenza 2000a, Puebla-Olivares et al 2008). This realization led to the development of a new, country-wide taxonomic treatment under the evolutionary species concept (Navarro-Sigüenza and Peterson 2004), which was subsequently criticized as cursory and unscientific by Remsen (2005).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing Check-lists and Avifauna-wide Reviews: Mexican Bird Taxonomy Revisited

Peterson

Navarro‐Sigüenza

2009

The Auk

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Red stars indicate evidence of hybridization; the top-most one, in Ecuador, is from the study of Puebla-Olivares et al (2008).…”

Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An examination of species limits in theAulacorhynchus“prasinus” toucanet complex (Aves: Ramphastidae)

Winker

2016

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of species recognized in Aulacorhynchus toucanets has varied tremendously over the past century. Revisors seem to disagree on whether head and bill coloration are useful indicators of species limits, especially in the A. “prasinus” complex. Using morphometrics, I tested the hypothesis that the major color-based subspecific groups of A. “prasinus” sensu lato are simply “cookie-cutter” (i.e., morphologically nearly identical) toucanets with different head and bill colorations. Univariate and multivariate analyses show that they are not simply morphological replicates of different colors: a complex array of morphometric similarities and dissimilarities occur between the major subspecific groups, and these variations differ between the sexes. Latitude and longitude had a small but significant association with female (but not male) PC1 and PC2. Hybridization and intergradation were also considered using plumage and bill characters as a surrogate to infer gene flow. Hybridization as indicated by phenotype appears to be substantial between A. “p.” cyanolaemus and A. “p.” atrogularis and nonexistent between other major groups, although from genetic evidence it is likely rare between A. “p.” albivitta and A. “p.” cyanolaemus. The congruence and complexities of the morphological and color changes occurring among these groups suggest that ecological adaptation (through natural selection) and social selection have co-occurred among these groups and that species limits are involved. Further, hybridization is not evident at key places, despite in many cases (hypothetical) opportunity for gene flow. Consequently, I recommend that this complex be recognized as comprising five biological species: A. wagleri, prasinus, caeruleogularis, albivitta, and atrogularis. Four of these also have valid subspecies within them, and additional work may eventually support elevation of some of these subspecies to full species. Species limits in South America especially need more study.

show abstract

SPECIATION IN THE EMERALD TOUCANET (AULACORHYNCHUS PRASINUS) COMPLEX

Cited by 63 publications

References 44 publications

An Update of Wallace’s Zoogeographic Regions of the World

An Update of Wallace’s Zoogeographic Regions of the World

Constructing Check-lists and Avifauna-wide Reviews: Mexican Bird Taxonomy Revisited

An examination of species limits in theAulacorhynchus“prasinus” toucanet complex (Aves: Ramphastidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About