Speciation and detection of arsenic in aqueous samples: A review of recent progress in non-atomic spectrometric methods

Ma, Jian; Sengupta, Mainak; Yuan, Dongxing; Dasgupta, Purnendu Κ.

doi:10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.029

Cited by 156 publications

(62 citation statements)

References 170 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the highly sensitive methods for arsenic speciation have used high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation with detection of atomic fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS), and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS) [21,22,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. For solid samples, such as chicken meat, arsenic species must be extracted into solution amenable for HPLC analysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Determination of trace concentrations of various arsenic species in solid samples, such as chicken meat, requires appropriate extraction [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], followed by efficient separation and sensitive detection [38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Most of the highly sensitive methods for arsenic speciation have used high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation with detection of atomic fluorescence, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS), and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESIMS) [21,22,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Enzyme-assisted extraction and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for the determination of arsenic species in chicken meat

Liu

Peng

et al. 2015

Analytica Chimica Acta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enzyme-assisted extraction and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for the determination of arsenic species in chicken meat

Liu

Peng

et al. 2015

Analytica Chimica Acta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Accumulation of arsenic in the body poses significant health risks and may lead to arsenicosis [3]. USA Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2006 has diminished acceptable maximum contaminant level (MCL) for arsenic in drinking water from 50 down to 10 μg/L, and stricter norms have been set in headquarters of Peoples Republic of China, United Nations Health Organization, and European Union [4][5][6]. Arsenic contamination is both natural and due to anthropogenic sources.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Synthetic and Natural Zeolites Tailored for As(V) Sorption

Krauklis¹

2018

Zeolites and Their Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Arsenic in drinking water poses serious potential health risks in more than 30 countries with total affected population of around 100 million people. Natural and synthetic zeolites can be tailored in order to obtain improved sorption of As(V) making them a relatively cheap and efficient material for water remediation. The chapter is concentrated on the zeolitic materials for water remediation, and reports new findings regarding modification methods and comparison of such materials for the use in As(V) sorption applications. Methods of modification of zeolites are developed and explained. On the experimental and novel scale, using developed methods, 11 novel materials are synthesized and studied. Initial and modified materials are characterized by optical microscopy, SEM and EDX, as well as by metal content in those which are determined using dissolution in acids and FAAS.

show abstract

“…Many chemical-based As detection methods including AFS (atomic fluorescence spectroscopy), ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry), ICP-AES (ICP-atomic emission spectrometry), GFAAS (graphite furnace atomic absorption), HGAAS (gaseous hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry), and HPLC-ICP-MS (high-performance liquid chromatography-ICP-MS) are reliable with high sensitivity, however, these methods are usually expensive, hard to maintain the equipments, and unfavorable for rapid screening of large-scale test or applied in situ (Ma et al, 2014;Kaur et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%