2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40902-022-00351-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specially designed and CAD/CAM manufactured allogeneic bone blocks using for augmentation of a highly atrophic maxilla show a stable base for an all-on-six treatment concept: a case report

Abstract: Background In terms of a highly atrophic maxilla, bone augmentation still remains very challenging. With the introduction of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) for allogeneic bone blocks, a new method for the treatment of bone deficiencies was created. This case report demonstrates the successful use of two specially designed and CAD/CAM manufactured allogeneic bone blocks for a full arch reconstruction of a highly atrophic maxilla with an all-on-six concept. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. 16,21,97,101,103,[120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127] Depending on the nature of the graft, the results provided have been heterogeneous, with the vertical bone gain ranging from 4.12 mm (95% confidence interval 3.11-5.13 mm) for autogenous bone block to 2.03 mm (95% confidence interval 1.88-2.18 mm) for allograft bone block according to a recent systematic review. 66 Also, when using autogenous bone, the choice of the technique seems to influence the results heavily, with worse results for onlay bone block (3.5 mm, 95% confidence interval 2.2-4.9 mm) than for the three-dimensional "shell technique" (2.0 mm, 95% confidence interval 1.9-2.2 mm).…”
Section: Effectiveness Based On Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. 16,21,97,101,103,[120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127] Depending on the nature of the graft, the results provided have been heterogeneous, with the vertical bone gain ranging from 4.12 mm (95% confidence interval 3.11-5.13 mm) for autogenous bone block to 2.03 mm (95% confidence interval 1.88-2.18 mm) for allograft bone block according to a recent systematic review. 66 Also, when using autogenous bone, the choice of the technique seems to influence the results heavily, with worse results for onlay bone block (3.5 mm, 95% confidence interval 2.2-4.9 mm) than for the three-dimensional "shell technique" (2.0 mm, 95% confidence interval 1.9-2.2 mm).…”
Section: Effectiveness Based On Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Recent computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) opened the horizon for new opportunities in biological applications. [18][19][20] In this case report, a custom-made CAD-CAM scaffold was fabricated using an allogenic bone block which was anatomically shaped to seal a large oro-antral communication. A dental implant was placed after 5 months of healing time and collected bone chips were histologically examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the harvesting procedure may lead to donor site morbidity, and there are limitations on the available volume. Allografts and xenografts, obtained from human donors and animal species, respectively, bypass the issue of limited material availability [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. However, they carry risks of immunogenicity, disease transmission, and may lack the osteoinductive properties found in autografts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%