M any women rely on publicly funded family planning and women's health clinics as their only recent source of care, including preventive care (Frost, Gold, and Bucek 2012; Guttmacher Institute 2016). Some of these organizations provide abortion services in addition to family planning and other reproductive health services. Consequently, such organizations may face politically motivated funding cuts, which may also impact important non-abortion outcomes and related services.One primary cause of women's health facility closures is the loss of public funding. In the past few years, several states have attempted and in some cases succeeded in cutting public funding for women's health organizations that provide (or are affiliated with provision of) abortion services. These policies are exogenous to our outcomes of interest: women's cancer screenings and routine checkups. This is clearly stated by one of the state legislators responsible for recent funding changes in Texas,